IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i15-16p2235-2241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing an Australian framework for scope of practice decisions by nurses and midwives – lessons for cross‐border standards development

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Fox‐Young
  • Christine Ashley

Abstract

Aims and objectives. Lessons for cross‐border standard development learned in the consultation to create the Australian National Framework for the Development of Decision‐Making Tools for Nursing and Midwifery (National DMF). Background. Although existing tools are broadly consistent, no cross‐border or internationally accepted version exists of scope of practice decision‐making guides. Development of a national framework in Australia’s federated political system required commitment to wide consultation and consensus. Concurrent moves towards national registration stimulated timely completion of the work. Contextual factors such as differentiation of the profession of midwifery from nursing and varying understanding of scope of practice concepts in eight Australian jurisdictions were challenges. Design. A consultative policy development framework was used. Methods. Thematic analysis of written responses to a draft document and of focus group feedback informed the production of the National DMF. Results. A widely accepted National DMF allowing nurses and midwives in Australia to engage in planned changes to professional practice, grounded in the professional judgement of the individual nurse or midwife, and collaboration with the consumer. Conclusions. The project’s grounding in consensus influenced the process and outcomes of consultation. A nationally consistent framework, incorporating useful decision‐making tools for two professions and principles to guide implementation and evaluation, was a distinct achievement. The article adds to accumulated knowledge by: • identifying the professional and political factors influencing consultation and outcomes in cross‐border standard development and • exploring key considerations for future projects to produce national or international professional standards that are relevant across borders and across professions. Relevance to clinical practice. Decision‐making tools that assist nurses and midwives in determining their scopes of practice and guide them in delegating aspects of consumer care to other health care workers are an essential component of any suite of professional practice standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Fox‐Young & Christine Ashley, 2010. "Developing an Australian framework for scope of practice decisions by nurses and midwives – lessons for cross‐border standards development," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2235-2241, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:15-16:p:2235-2241
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03097.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03097.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03097.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gerard Fealy & Mary Casey & Daniela Rohde & Anne‐Marie Brady & Josephine Hegarty & Catriona Kennedy & Martin McNamara & Pauline O'Reilly & Geraldine Prizeman, 2015. "Scope of practice decision making: findings from a national survey of Irish nurses and midwives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2871-2880, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:15-16:p:2235-2241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.