IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i15-16p2117-2127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships among nutritional self‐efficacy, health locus of control and nutritional status in older Taiwanese adults

Author

Listed:
  • Su‐Hui Chen
  • Gayle Acton
  • Jung‐Hua Shao

Abstract

Aim. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among selected demographic characteristics, nutrition self‐efficacy, health locus of control and nutritional status in older Taiwanese adults. Background. The number of older adults in Taiwan is increasing, and they have been shown to have poor nutritional status. However, little is known about the factors that lead to poor nutritional status in this population. Design. Correlational, cross‐sectional study. Methods. Participants were randomly selected from two district public health centres in Yilan County, Taiwan. Of 162 individuals who met the study criteria, 156 agreed to participate and provided data on demographic information, nutrition self‐efficacy (Cardiac Diet Self‐Efficacy scale), health locus of control (Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale) and nutritional status (Mini‐Nutritional Assessment and serum albumin levels). Results. The majority of this sample was healthy men (60·9%) with a mean age of 72·29 years. The results indicated that age, educational level, current chronic diseases and chance health locus of control all affected nutritional status in terms of Mini‐Nutritional Assessment scores, but only current chronic diseases explained significant variance in nutritional status in terms of albumin levels. Conclusions. The current study integrated self‐efficacy theory and Health Locus of Control theory to better understand how background characteristics, nutrition self‐efficacy and Health Locus of Control relate to nutritional status in older Taiwanese adults. However, the overall predicted variance accounted for by predictors was small, further research is therefore necessary to gain a deeper understanding of nutritional status and its factors among older Taiwanese adults. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses can help older persons identify factors that relate to their nutritional status and plan effective interventions to maintain healthy nutrition behaviours with the following risk characteristics: (1) lower level of education, (2) more chronic diseases and (3) external control orientation.

Suggested Citation

  • Su‐Hui Chen & Gayle Acton & Jung‐Hua Shao, 2010. "Relationships among nutritional self‐efficacy, health locus of control and nutritional status in older Taiwanese adults," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2117-2127, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:15-16:p:2117-2127
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03186.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03186.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03186.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahdi Moshki & Khadijeh Cheravi, 2016. "Relationships among depression during pregnancy, social support and health locus of control among Iranian pregnant women," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 62(2), pages 148-155, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:15-16:p:2117-2127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.