IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i11-12p1495-1503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pressure ulcer guideline development and dissemination in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Esther Meesterberends
  • Ruud Halfens
  • Christa Lohrmann
  • Rianne De Wit

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To explore the current state of pressure ulcer guideline development and dissemination, from national to local level (i.e. nursing homes) in six European countries: England, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Sweden. Background. Pressure ulcers are a persistent problem in healthcare institutions. Their prevalence is influenced by many factors, one of them being the development and dissemination of pressure ulcer guidelines. These are difficult and complex processes and it is not clear whether they differ between European countries. Design. Literature review and semi‐structured interviews. Method. Interviews were conducted in six countries at national and nursing home level. Results. Four countries had national pressure ulcer prevention and treatment guidelines. Portugal had no national guidelines and Sweden had shifted the responsibility to regional level. All participating nursing homes had pressure ulcer guidelines except those in Portugal. Control and monitoring of guideline dissemination was carried out only in Sweden and England. Conclusions. All countries studied have national or regional pressure ulcer prevention and treatment guidelines, except Portugal. Portugal is also the only country where none of the nursing homes included had pressure ulcer guidelines. Because the dissemination of such guidelines does not imply actual implementation, further research should focus on the implementation process. Relevance to clinical practice. Clinical guidelines, like pressure ulcer guidelines, are important tools in guiding the care processes in healthcare institutions. Successful dissemination of guidelines from national level to individual healthcare institutions is a first and necessary step in actually applying them. Monitoring of the guideline dissemination process is therefore essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther Meesterberends & Ruud Halfens & Christa Lohrmann & Rianne De Wit, 2010. "Pressure ulcer guideline development and dissemination in Europe," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1495-1503, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1495-1503
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03229.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03229.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03229.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad Tubaishat & Panos Papanikolaou & Denis Anthony & Laila Habiballah, 2018. "Pressure Ulcers Prevalence in the Acute Care Setting: A Systematic Review, 2000-2015," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 27(6), pages 643-659, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1495-1503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.