IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i8p980-988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practice development ‘without walls’ and the quandary of corporate practice

Author

Listed:
  • Iain Graham
  • Carol Fielding
  • Debbie Rooke
  • Steven Keen

Abstract

Aim. The context of this study is a group of clinical nurse specialists from across a Trust seeking accreditation as a practice development unit. The university was asked to facilitate the accreditation process via 11 2‐hour learning sessions (including a one‐hour focus group). During initial discussions between the university and practice development unit, the overarching research question for this study was set as: ‘what are the main roles and responsibilities of clinical nurse specialists?’ Background. Although there is no known study of a practice development unit based beyond a ward or speciality, the central tenet of the practice development unit literature is that units must demonstrate their worth if they are to survive and harness senior management support in doing so. Design and methods. Data gleaned from the transcribed audio tape‐recordings of the learning sessions were studied at least three times to ensure transcription accuracy and produce detailed charts. Ethical approval was granted by the appropriate Local Research Ethics Committee and written informed consent obtained from clinical nurse specialists. The study lasted 30 months and ended in October 2004. Results. The four crucial statements that give meaning to specialist practice are: quality care giver; expert; information giver and initiator of change. Further analysis reveals the area of corporate and political practice as being missing from this and other lists of clinical nurse specialist attributes found in the literature. Clinical nurse specialists characterize their relationship with the Trust in terms of dichotomy – differing agendas and perceptions of value. Conclusions. The specialist role requires professional development in the areas of corporate and political acumen and professional business management. Relevance to clinical practice. While the findings of this study relate to one Trust and a group of 16 clinical nurse specialists, with careful application they may be transferable to other settings and groups of senior nurses.

Suggested Citation

  • Iain Graham & Carol Fielding & Debbie Rooke & Steven Keen, 2006. "Practice development ‘without walls’ and the quandary of corporate practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(8), pages 980-988, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:8:p:980-988
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01400.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01400.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01400.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:8:p:980-988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.