IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i8p1045-1056.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients’ perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and identification of areas for quality improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Åsa Muntlin
  • Lena Gunningberg
  • Marianne Carlsson

Abstract

Aims. This paper reports a study to identify patient's perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and areas for quality improvement. Background. Patients are not always satisfied with the care received at emergency departments. More attention needs to be paid to the specific needs and expectations of the non‐urgent group of patients, who make up the majority of attenders at many emergency departments. Nurses’ and physicians’ perceptions about good quality of care do not always agree with patients’ perceptions. Instruments measuring patient satisfaction have often been focused on inpatient treatment. Method. A prospective, descriptive survey design was adopted and the study took place in one emergency department at a Swedish university hospital in 2002. The participants were 99 women and 101 men, with an average age of 51 years. The emergency department version of the questionnaire Quality from the Patient's Perspective was used for data collection. Results. Patients estimated quality of care at the emergency department as fairly good, but there were areas in need of improvement. A high percent of inadequate quality was related to the environment in the emergency department. About 20% of patients reported that they did not receive effective pain relief. More than 20% estimated that nurses did not show an interest in their life situation and patients did not receive useful information on self‐care and about which physician was responsible for their medical care. Conclusions. The use of a research‐based instrument gave valuable information for quality improvement in clinical practice. Many of the identified areas for quality improvement are related to nursing care. Therefore, the importance of nursing care in the emergency department should be highlighted to nurses and physicians and they also need to be more attentive to the need of the individual patient. Relevance to clinical practice. Identifying areas for quality improvements are important, to know where to take action. These findings may facilitate the work with changing attitudes and working routines, which are needed to deliver effective care and to improve patients’ perceptions of quality of care at emergency departments.

Suggested Citation

  • Åsa Muntlin & Lena Gunningberg & Marianne Carlsson, 2006. "Patients’ perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and identification of areas for quality improvement," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(8), pages 1045-1056, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:8:p:1045-1056
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01368.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01368.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01368.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elisabeth Patiraki & Chryssoula Karlou & Georgios Efstathiou & Haritini Tsangari & Anastasios Merkouris & Darja Jarosova & Helena Leino-Kilpi & Riitta Suhonen & Zoltan Balogh & Alvisa Palese & Marco T, 2014. "The Relationship Between Surgical Patients and Nurses Characteristics With Their Perceptions of Caring Behaviors," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 23(2), pages 132-152, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:8:p:1045-1056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.