IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i8p1033-1044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurse discharge planning in the emergency department: a Toowoomba, Australia, study

Author

Listed:
  • Desley Hegney
  • Elizabeth Buikstra
  • Chris Chamberlain
  • Judy March
  • Michelle McKay
  • Gail Cope
  • Tony Fallon

Abstract

Aim. This study aimed to ascertain whether a model of risk screening carried out by an experienced community nurse was effective in decreasing re‐presentations and readmissions and the length of stay of older people presenting to an Australian emergency department. Objectives. The objectives of the study were to (i) identify all older people who presented to the emergency department of an Australian regional hospital; (ii) identify the proportion of re‐presentations and readmissions within this cohort of patients; and (iii) risk‐screen all older patients and provide referrals when necessary to community services. Design. The study involved the application of a risk screening tool to 2139 men and women over 70 years of age from October 2002 to June 2003. Of these, 1102 (51·5%) were admitted and 246 (11·5%) were re‐presentations with the same illness. Patients presenting from Monday to Friday from 08:00 to 16:00 hours were risk‐screened face to face in the emergency department. Outside of these hours, but within 72 hours of presentation, risk screening was carried out by telephone if the patient was discharged or within the ward if the patient had been admitted. Results. There was a 16% decrease in the re‐presentation rate of people over 70 years of age to the emergency department. Additionally during this time there was a 5·5% decrease in the readmission rate (this decrease did not reach significance). There was a decrease in the average length of stay in hospital from 6·17 days per patient in October 2002 to 5·37 days per patient in June 2003. An unexpected finding was the decrease in re‐presentations in people who represented to the emergency department three or more times per month (known as ‘frequent flyers’). Conclusions. Risk screening of older people in the emergency department by a specialist community nurse resulted in a decrease of re‐presentations to the emergency department. There was some evidence of a decreased length of stay. It is suggested that the decrease in re‐presentations was the result of increased referral and use of community services. It appears that the use of a specialist community nurse to undertake risk screening rather than the triage nurse may impact on service utilization. Relevance to clinical practice. It is apparent that older people presenting to the emergency department have complex care needs. Undertaking risk screening using an experienced community nurse to ascertain the correct level of community assistance required and ensuring speedy referral to appropriate community services has positive outcomes for both the hospital and the patient.

Suggested Citation

  • Desley Hegney & Elizabeth Buikstra & Chris Chamberlain & Judy March & Michelle McKay & Gail Cope & Tony Fallon, 2006. "Nurse discharge planning in the emergency department: a Toowoomba, Australia, study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(8), pages 1033-1044, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:8:p:1033-1044
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01405.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01405.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01405.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:8:p:1033-1044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.