IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i6p742-750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of written materials vs. materials and counselling for women with sexual dysfunction and multiple sclerosis

Author

Listed:
  • Jeannine Marguerite Christopherson
  • Katherine Moore
  • Frederick W Foley
  • Kenneth G Warren

Abstract

Aim. Evaluate whether symptoms of vaginal dryness, low libido, less intense or delayed orgasm could be improved in women with multiple sclerosis who took part in an education or education plus counselling programme. Background. Sexual dysfunction, a prevalent symptom in women with multiple sclerosis, can negatively affect quality‐of‐life. Methods. Women attending a large multiple sclerosis clinic were invited and 62 were randomized into one of two groups. Group 1 received written materials on primary, secondary and tertiary sexual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis as well as additional resources (books, websites, list of local psychologists specializing in sexual counselling). Group 2 received the same written materials as well as three counselling sessions from the clinic nurse, the latter two by telephone. The primary outcome measures were the expanded disability status scale and the multiple sclerosis intimacy and sexuality questionnaire‐19. Repeated‐measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate sexual dysfunction score over time and to compare two groups. Results. At baseline, total expanded disability status scale scores were not correlated with primary, secondary or tertiary sexual dysfunction. Total multiple sclerosis intimacy and sexuality questionnaire‐19 score was correlated with use of anti‐cholinergic medications [r (54) = 0·28, P

Suggested Citation

  • Jeannine Marguerite Christopherson & Katherine Moore & Frederick W Foley & Kenneth G Warren, 2006. "A comparison of written materials vs. materials and counselling for women with sexual dysfunction and multiple sclerosis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(6), pages 742-750, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:6:p:742-750
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01437.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01437.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01437.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:6:p:742-750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.