IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i6p735-741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of HIV positive and negative pregnant women at a public sector hospital in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Candice Bodkin
  • Hester Klopper
  • Gayle Langley

Abstract

Aim. The aim of the study was to compare HIV positive and negative pregnant women with respect to maternal and neonatal outcome to inform the development of clinical practice guidelines. Background. HIV infection in pregnancy places an added burden on the physical ability of the woman's body to cope with pregnancy. As a result HIV causes an exaggeration of the problems related to pregnancy. Method. Data were collected by means of a retrospective record review conducted on 212 stratified randomly selected HIV positive and 101 matched HIV negative pregnant women. The two sample t‐test and Fisher exact test were used to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes of HIV positive and negative pregnant women. Results. HIV positive pregnant women had a significantly lower haemoglobin (10·85 vs. 11·48 g/dl; P = 0·001), attended significantly fewer antenatal clinic appointments (4·03 vs. 4·63; P = 0·04), weighed significantly less (72·07 vs. 76·69 kg; P = 0·02) and were significantly more likely to present with an abnormal vaginal discharge (32·55 vs. 24·75%; P = 0·02) than HIV negative pregnant women. The difference in the prevalence in HIV positive pregnant women of pregnancy induced hypertension (16·98 vs. 9·90%; P = 0·06), syphilis infection (5·95 vs. 0·99%; P = 0·062) and urinary tract infection (15·53 vs. 7·92%; P = 0·06) approached significance when compared with HIV negative pregnant women. HIV positive pregnant women were significantly more likely to present with intrauterine growth retardation (4·72 vs. 0%; P = 0·03), significantly more likely to deliver earlier (37·92 vs. 38·51 weeks; P = 0·03) and significantly more likely to deliver neonates weighing less (2969·98 vs. 3138·43 g; P = 0·01) than HIV negative pregnant women. Conclusion. The Department of Health attributes the high rate of HIV and AIDS related maternal morbidity and mortality in South Africa to the absence of accepted and practical guidelines for midwives’ antenatal assessment and management of HIV positive pregnant women. Relevance to clinical practice. This study identifies maternal and neonatal outcomes related to HIV infection in pregnancy and provides evidence required to inform the development of clinical practice guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Candice Bodkin & Hester Klopper & Gayle Langley, 2006. "A comparison of HIV positive and negative pregnant women at a public sector hospital in South Africa," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(6), pages 735-741, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:6:p:735-741
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01438.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01438.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01438.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:6:p:735-741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.