IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i5p554-564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model testing on the crisis interventions and actions to prevent medical disputes: a Taiwanese nursing perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Huey‐Ming Tzeng

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This study investigated the contributions of comprehensiveness and necessity scales on crisis interventions and actions toward nursing practice‐related medical disputes in Taiwanese hospitals and institutions’ demographic characteristics, to overall satisfaction toward nursing‐related crisis management policies and interventions and overall satisfaction toward their institution's crisis management system. Background. In a health‐care environment that is focused on cost containment, for overworked nurses and understaffed medical wards, patients still expect nurses to provide high quality, compassionate care. Patients usually regard nurses as the principal link between the technical and interpersonal aspects of their care. However, current hospital systems tend to require patients to be self‐reliant in managing their own care. Patient mistrust of medical care providers might have contributed to the current medical error/dispute crisis. Methods. In this cross‐sectional study, the subjects were nursing directors of Taiwanese hospitals (197 valid subjects). The author developed the questionnaire used in this study. Results. The ordinal logistic regression analyses demonstrated that being a public hospital managed by the government, being a hospital operated by a corporate body, the more comprehensive the technical/structural aspect and the assessment aspect and the more needed the psychological aspect, contribute to higher general satisfaction levels toward nursing‐related crisis management. The more comprehensive the strategic aspect and having more acute beds, contributes to higher satisfaction levels with their institution's overall crisis management activities. Conclusions. These findings inferred a possible change in a hospital's resource allocation or power structure when dealing with issues of patient care quality, including nursing practice‐related crisis management policies, interventions and actions. Relevant to clinical practice. A good crisis management system may help to keep a crisis from worsening, which might lead to a serious situation that includes malpractice litigation. It is believed that the questionnaire used in this study may be used as a diagnostic tool for assessing a crisis management system within a hospital's nursing environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Huey‐Ming Tzeng, 2006. "Model testing on the crisis interventions and actions to prevent medical disputes: a Taiwanese nursing perspective," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 554-564, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:5:p:554-564
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01365.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01365.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01365.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:5:p:554-564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.