IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i5p525-534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing documentation audit – the effect of a VIPS implementation programme in Denmark

Author

Listed:
  • Mette Rosendal Darmer
  • Lena Ankersen
  • Bettina Geissler Nielsen
  • Gitte Landberger
  • Elisabeth Lippert
  • Ingrid Egerod

Abstract

Aim and objectives. The aim of this paper is to present a study describing nurses’ adherence to the VIPS model by evaluating the quality of nursing assessment, and the quantity of completed nursing care plans. Background. Numerous efforts have been made over the years to improve nursing documentation in Denmark. Hospitals have traditionally based nurses’ charting on a rudimentary version of the nursing process and on Virginia Henderson's theory of human needs. In 2002–2004 the Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, introduced the Swedish VIPS model for nursing documentation. VIPS is an acronym for well being, integrity, prevention and safety, all of which are seen as major goals for nursing care. The model organizes nursing data according to a system of keywords, which facilitates storage and retrieval of data. Design and methods. The design in this part of the study was retrospective, wherein 50 journals from each of the departments of cardiology, neurology, oncology and urology were audited annually for three years using the Cat‐ch‐Ing instrument (n = 600). All nursing journals were randomly selected by including the first 50 journals at each site given a specific date. Results. The nursing documentation significantly improved during the course of the study. After the second year the participants used the keywords appropriately and correctly according to the VIPS model. Application of primary nursing increased during the study. Initial, ongoing and discharge patient status improved. The nurses’ familiarity with nursing diagnoses, goals and interventions increased. Conclusions. The structured implementation programme significantly improved nursing documentation, and the simultaneous training of the entire nursing staff shows promise. The VIPS model has prepared the nurses for more complex computerized taxonomies and classification systems in the future by improving the nurses’ analytical skills. Relevance to clinical practice. New strategies for improving nursing documentation have been demonstrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Mette Rosendal Darmer & Lena Ankersen & Bettina Geissler Nielsen & Gitte Landberger & Elisabeth Lippert & Ingrid Egerod, 2006. "Nursing documentation audit – the effect of a VIPS implementation programme in Denmark," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 525-534, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:5:p:525-534
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01475.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01475.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01475.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:5:p:525-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.