IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i4p480-489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise: a grounded theory study

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Bonner
  • Jennifer Greenwood

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This purpose of this study was to describe the process of expertise acquisition in nephrology nursing practice. Background. It has been recognized for a number of decades that experts, compared with other practitioners in a number of professions and occupations, are the most knowledgeable and effective, in terms of both the quantity and quality of output. Studies relating to expertise have been undertaken in a range of nursing contexts and specialties; to date, however, none have been undertaken which focus on nephrology nursing. Design. This study, using grounded theory methodology, took place in one renal unit in New South Wales, Australia and involved six non‐expert and 11 expert nurses. Methods. Simultaneous data collection and analysis took place using participant observation, semi‐structured interviews and review of nursing documentation. Findings. The study revealed a three‐stage skills‐acquisitive process that was identified as non‐expert, experienced non‐expert and expert stages. Each stage was typified by four characteristics, which altered during the acquisitive process; these were knowledge, experience, skill and focus. Conclusion. This was the first study to explore nephrology nursing expertise and uncovered new aspects of expertise not documented in the literature and it also made explicit other areas, which had only been previously implied. Relevance to clinical practice. Of significance to nursing, the exercise of expertise is a function of the recognition of expertise by others and it includes the blurring of the normal boundaries of professional practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Bonner & Jennifer Greenwood, 2006. "The acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise: a grounded theory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 480-489, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:480-489
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01361.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01361.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01361.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucy Bray & Caroline Sanders & Anita Flynn, 2010. "Paediatric catheterisation: exploring and understanding children’s nurses’ perceptions and practice in an acute setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(21‐22), pages 3235-3243, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:480-489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.