IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i2p145-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chest drain removal pain and its management: a literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth A Bruce
  • Richard F Howard
  • Linda S Franck

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The purpose of this review was to analyse critically the published research on chest drain removal pain and its management. The findings of descriptive and non‐pharmacological intervention studies were summarized and studies of analgesic efficacy were critiqued in depth. Background. The removal of a chest drain is a painful and frightening experience, particularly for children. However, there is limited research regarding the amount of pain experienced or effectiveness of analgesia for this procedure. Results. Fourteen studies were reviewed, including five descriptive studies; three studies of non‐pharmacological interventions; and six randomized controlled trials of morphine, local anaesthetics and Entonox. The search revealed only two paediatric studies. Many of the studies had design limitations or were poorly reported. The majority of studies indicated that patients experienced moderate to severe pain during chest drain removal, even when morphine or local anaesthetics were given. Conclusions. Morphine alone does not provide satisfactory analgesia for chest drain removal pain. Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, local anaesthetics and inhalation agents may have a role to play in providing more effective analgesia for this procedure. Relevance to clinical practice. Analgesic protocols for the management of painful procedures such as chest drain removal are unsatisfactory and practice in this area should be revised. More research is needed to determine the efficacy of drugs other than morphine, particularly Entonox and to investigate multi‐modal techniques of management further.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth A Bruce & Richard F Howard & Linda S Franck, 2006. "Chest drain removal pain and its management: a literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 145-154, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:2:p:145-154
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01273.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01273.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01273.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:2:p:145-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.