IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i11p1371-1375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge and attitudes of medical, nursing, dentistry and health technician students towards organ donation: a pilot study

Author

Listed:
  • Fugen Goz
  • Mustafa Goz
  • Medıne Erkan

Abstract

Aim. This pilot study assesses the knowledge and attitudes of medicine, nursing, dentistry and health technical students toward organ donation. Background. Medicine, nursing, dentistry and health technical students’ knowledge of and attitudes towards organ donation may be a factor in organ procurement rates. There is a lack of information about how Turkish medicine, nursing, dentistry and health technical students perceive organ donation, and what they know about it. Method. Students completed a self‐administered questionnaire after a lecture. The questionnaire included a test that was used to assess knowledge of and attitudes about organ donation. Results. Of the students, 56·8% were men, 91·4% were 18–24‐year old and 89·4% from east region of Turkey. Of students, 65·5% were willing, 9% were not willing, 25·5% were hesitant about organ donation and 6% of willing students reported carrying a signed card. The most common reason for unwillingness to organ donation was worries about illegal behaviours (2·4%). There was a statistical relationship between willingness of students for organ donation and gender but were not any statistical relationship between willingness of students for organ donation and age, school, region and recognizing relatives whose need organ transplantation. Majority of the students listed transplantable organs truly but 63·1% were had no idea about organ donation process. Conclusion. Students’ had a lack of information about organ donation. The results of this study support a greater emphasis on providing information regarding transplantation in medicine, nursing, dentistry and health technical schools to improve the knowledge of future heath care professionals about transplantation and organ donation issues. Relevance to clinical practice. These findings highlight a need to review these schools’ curricula and emphasize the importance of organ transplantation. This strategy may be part of the solution to the chronic shortage of donor organs for transplantation.

Suggested Citation

  • Fugen Goz & Mustafa Goz & Medıne Erkan, 2006. "Knowledge and attitudes of medical, nursing, dentistry and health technician students towards organ donation: a pilot study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(11), pages 1371-1375, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:11:p:1371-1375
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01431.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01431.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01431.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Donal McGlade & Carol McClenahan & Barbara Pierscionek, 2014. "Pro-Donation Behaviours of Nursing Students from the Four Countries of the UK," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-6, March.
    2. Marzena Mikla & Anna Maria Cybulska & Daria Schneider-Matyka & Antonio Ríos & Mariusz Panczyk & Artur Kotwas & Beata Karakiewicz & Elżbieta Grochans, 2023. "A Multicentre Study of the Attitude of Medical Students towards Organ Donation and Transplantation in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Eun Ja Yeun & Young Mi Kwon & Jung A Kim, 2015. "Decision‐making regarding organ donation in Korean adults: A grounded‐theory study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 208-213, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:11:p:1371-1375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.