IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnddns/v2016y2016i1n4961681.html

Research on the Effects of Heterogeneity on Pedestrian Dynamics in Walkway of Subway Station

Author

Listed:
  • Haoling Wu
  • Zhenzhou Yuan
  • Huixuan Li
  • Junfang Tian

Abstract

The major objective of this paper is to study the effects of heterogeneity on pedestrian dynamics in walkway of subway station. We analyze the observed data of the selected facility and find that walking speed and occupied space were varied in the population. In reality, pedestrians are heterogeneous individuals with different attributes. However, the research on how the heterogeneity affects the pedestrian dynamics in facilities of subway stations is insufficient. The improved floor field model is therefore presented to explore the effects of heterogeneity. Pedestrians are classified into pedestrians walking in pairs, fast pedestrians, and ordinary pedestrians. For convenience, they are denoted as P‐pedestrians, F‐pedestrians, and O‐pedestrians, respectively. The proposed model is validated under homogeneous and heterogeneous conditions. Three pedestrian compositions are simulated to analyze the effects of heterogeneity on pedestrian dynamics. The results show that P‐pedestrians have negative effect and F‐pedestrians have positive effect. All of the results in this paper indicate that the capacity of walkway is not a constant value. It changes with different component proportions of heterogeneous pedestrians. The heterogeneity of pedestrian has an important influence on the pedestrian dynamics in the walkway of the subway station.

Suggested Citation

  • Haoling Wu & Zhenzhou Yuan & Huixuan Li & Junfang Tian, 2016. "Research on the Effects of Heterogeneity on Pedestrian Dynamics in Walkway of Subway Station," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2016(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jnddns:v:2016:y:2016:i:1:n:4961681
    DOI: 10.1155/2016/4961681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4961681
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2016/4961681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blue, Victor J. & Adler, Jeffrey L., 2001. "Cellular automata microsimulation for modeling bi-directional pedestrian walkways," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 293-312, March.
    2. Dirk Helbing & Lubos Buzna & Anders Johansson & Torsten Werner, 2005. "Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Stefania Bandini & Sara Manzoni & Giuseppe Vizzari, 2009. "Agent Based Modeling and Simulation: An Informatics Perspective," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12(4), pages 1-4.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Flötteröd, Gunnar & Lämmel, Gregor, 2015. "Bidirectional pedestrian fundamental diagram," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 194-212.
    2. Jiang, Yan-Qun & Zhou, Shu-Guang & Duan, Ya-Li & Huang, Xiao-Qian, 2023. "A viscous continuum model with smoke effect for pedestrian evacuation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 621(C).
    3. Abdelghany, Ahmed & Abdelghany, Khaled & Mahmassani, Hani, 2016. "A hybrid simulation-assignment modeling framework for crowd dynamics in large-scale pedestrian facilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 159-176.
    4. Qingyan Ning & Maosheng Li, 2022. "Modeling Pedestrian Detour Behavior By-Passing Conflict Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Guo, Ren-Yong, 2014. "Simulation of spatial and temporal separation of pedestrian counter flow through a bottleneck," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 415(C), pages 428-439.
    6. Zhou, Zi-Xuan & Nakanishi, Wataru & Asakura, Yasuo, 2021. "Data-driven framework for the adaptive exit selection problem in pedestrian flow: Visual information based heuristics approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    7. Yamamoto, Hiroki & Yanagisawa, Daichi & Feliciani, Claudio & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2019. "Body-rotation behavior of pedestrians for collision avoidance in passing and cross flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 486-510.
    8. Hänseler, Flurin S. & Bierlaire, Michel & Farooq, Bilal & Mühlematter, Thomas, 2014. "A macroscopic loading model for time-varying pedestrian flows in public walking areas," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 60-80.
    9. Ji, Xiangfeng & Zhang, Jian & Ran, Bin, 2013. "A study on pedestrian choice between stairway and escalator in the transfer station based on floor field cellular automata," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(20), pages 5089-5100.
    10. Rui Jiang & Mao-Bin Hu & Qing-Song Wu & Wei-Guo Song, 2017. "Traffic Dynamics of Bicycle Flow: Experiment and Modeling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 998-1008, August.
    11. Feliciani, Claudio & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2016. "An improved Cellular Automata model to simulate the behavior of high density crowd and validation by experimental data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 451(C), pages 135-148.
    12. Yue, Hao & Guan, Hongzhi & Zhang, Juan & Shao, Chunfu, 2010. "Study on bi-direction pedestrian flow using cellular automata simulation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(3), pages 527-539.
    13. Robin, Th. & Antonini, G. & Bierlaire, M. & Cruz, J., 2009. "Specification, estimation and validation of a pedestrian walking behavior model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 36-56, January.
    14. Hänseler, Flurin S. & Lam, William H.K. & Bierlaire, Michel & Lederrey, Gael & Nikolić, Marija, 2017. "A dynamic network loading model for anisotropic and congested pedestrian flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 149-168.
    15. Lili Lu & Gang Ren & Wei Wang & Chen Yu & Chenzi Ding, 2013. "Exploring the Effects of Different Walking Strategies on Bi-Directional Pedestrian Flow," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-9, November.
    16. Haghani, Milad, 2021. "The knowledge domain of crowd dynamics: Anatomy of the field, pioneering studies, temporal trends, influential entities and outside-domain impact," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 580(C).
    17. Goldsztein, Guillermo H., 2017. "Crowd of individuals walking in opposite directions. A toy model to study the segregation of the group into lanes of individuals moving in the same direction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 162-173.
    18. Ji, Xiangfeng & Zhou, Xuemei & Ran, Bin, 2013. "A cell-based study on pedestrian acceleration and overtaking in a transfer station corridor," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(8), pages 1828-1839.
    19. Liqiang Ji & Yongsheng Qian & Junwei Zeng & Min Wang & Dejie Xu & Yan Yan & Shuo Feng, 2013. "Simulation of Evacuation Characteristics Using a 2‐Dimensional Cellular Automata Model for Pedestrian Dynamics," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2013(1).
    20. Yuan Tang & Yu Xue & Muyang Huang & Qiyun Wen & Bingling Cen & Dong Chen, 2023. "A Lattice Hydrodynamic Model for Four-Way Pedestrian Traffic with Turning Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnddns:v:2016:y:2016:i:1:n:4961681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/3059 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.