IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jjmath/v2022y2022i1n1021280.html

Multiple Attribute Group Decision‐Making Models Using Single‐Valued Neutrosophic and Linguistic Neutrosophic Hybrid Element Aggregation Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Sumin Zhang
  • Jun Ye

Abstract

Multiple attribute group decision‐making (MAGDM) issues may involve quantitative and qualitative attributes. In inconsistent and indeterminate decision‐making issues, current assessment information of quantitative and qualitative attributes with respect to alternatives only contains either numerical neutrosophic values or linguistic neutrosophic values as the single information expression. However, existing neutrosophic techniques cannot perform the mixed information denotation and aggregation operations of numerical neutrosophic values and linguistic neutrosophic values in neutrosophic decision‐making issues. To solve the puzzles, this article presents the information denotation, aggregation operations, and MAGDM models of single‐valued neutrosophic and linguistic neutrosophic hybrid sets/elements (SVNLNHSs/SVNLHEs) as new techniques to perform MAGDM issues with quantitative and qualitative attributes in the environment of SVNLNHEs. In this study, we first propose a SVNLNHS/SVNLNHE notion that consists of a single‐valued neutrosophic element (SVNE) for the quantitative argument and a linguistic neutrosophic element (LNE) for the qualitative argument. According to a linguistic and neutrosophic conversion function and its inverse conversion function, we present some basic operations of single‐valued neutrosophic elements and linguistic neutrosophic elements, the SVNLNHE weighted arithmetic mean (SVNLNHEWAMN) and SVNLNHE weighted geometric mean (SVNLNHEWGMN) operators (forming SVNEs), and the SVNLNHEWAML and SVNLNHEWGML operators (forming LNEs). Next, MAGDM models are established based on the SVNLNHEWAMN and SVNLNHEWGMN operators or the SVNLNHEWAML and SVNLNHEWGML operators to realize MAGDM issues with single‐valued neutrosophic and linguistic neutrosophic hybrid information, and then their applicability and availability are indicated through an illustrative example in the SVNLNHE circumstance. By comparison with the existing techniques, our new techniques reveal obvious advantages in the mixed information denotation, aggregation algorithms, and decision‐making methods in handling MAGDM issues with the quantitative and qualitative attributes in the setting of SVNLNHSs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumin Zhang & Jun Ye, 2022. "Multiple Attribute Group Decision‐Making Models Using Single‐Valued Neutrosophic and Linguistic Neutrosophic Hybrid Element Aggregation Algorithms," Journal of Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:1021280
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/1021280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1021280
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/1021280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan-juan Peng & Jian-qiang Wang & Jing Wang & Hong-yu Zhang & Xiao-hong Chen, 2016. "Simplified neutrosophic sets and their applications in multi-criteria group decision-making problems," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(10), pages 2342-2358, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shengjun Wu & Jie Wang & Guiwu Wei & Yu Wei, 2018. "Research on Construction Engineering Project Risk Assessment with Some 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Hamy Mean Operators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Kuei-Hu Chang, 2022. "A novel reliability calculation method under neutrosophic environments," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1599-1615, August.
    3. Nuraini Rahim & Lazim Abdullah & Binyamin Yusoff, 2020. "A Border Approximation Area Approach Considering Bipolar Neutrosophic Linguistic Variable for Sustainable Energy Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Wendi Chen & Jiaxing Gu & Shouzhen Zeng & Xiaoying Xie, 2023. "Solid Waste Landfill Site Assessment Framework Based on Single-Valued Neutrosophic Hybrid Aggregation and Multi-Criteria Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Qaisar Khan & Peide Liu & Tahir Mahmood, 2018. "Some Generalized Dice Measures for Double-Valued Neutrosophic Sets and Their Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Jun Ye & Kaiqian Du & Shigui Du & Rui Yong, 2025. "Slope Stability Classification Model Based on Single-Valued Neutrosophic Matrix Energy and Its Application Under a Single-Valued Neutrosophic Matrix Scenario," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 42(1), pages 163-180, March.
    7. Juan-juan Peng & Chao Tian & Zhi-qiang Zhang & Hai-yu Song & Jian-qiang Wang, 2019. "Single-Valued Neutrosophic Power Shapley Choquet Average Operators and Their Applications to Multi-Criteria Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Naeem Jan & Kifayat Ullah & Tahir Mahmood & Harish Garg & Bijan Davvaz & Arsham Borumand Saeid & Said Broumi, 2019. "Some Root Level Modifications in Interval Valued Fuzzy Graphs and Their Generalizations Including Neutrosophic Graphs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Chao Tian & Wen Yu Zhang & Shuai Zhang & Juan Juan Peng, 2019. "An Extended Single-Valued Neutrosophic Projection-Based Qualitative Flexible Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Yefei Liu & Xiaoping Yang, 2023. "EDAS Method for Single‐Valued Neutrosophic Number Multiattribute Group Decision‐Making and Applications to Physical Education Teaching Quality Evaluation in Colleges and Universities," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2023(1).
    11. Muhammad Riaz & Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Gülay Demir, 2023. "Efficient Decision Making for Sustainable Energy Using Single-Valued Neutrosophic Prioritized Interactive Aggregation Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-29, May.
    12. Chao Tian & Juan Juan Peng, 2020. "A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Based on the Improved Single-Valued Neutrosophic Weighted Geometric Operator," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Jie Wang & Jianping Lu & Guiwu Wei & Rui Lin & Cun Wei, 2019. "Models for MADM with Single-Valued Neutrosophic 2-Tuple Linguistic Muirhead Mean Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Shahzaib Ashraf & Shakoor Ahmad & Muhammad Naeem & Muhammad Riaz & Md. Ashraful Alam, 2022. "Novel EDAS Methodology Based on Single‐Valued Neutrosophic Aczel‐Alsina Aggregation Information and Their Application in Complex Decision‐Making," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    15. Chao Tian & Juan Juan Peng & Zhi Qiang Zhang & Mark Goh & Jian Qiang Wang, 2020. "A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Based on Single-Valued Neutrosophic Partitioned Heronian Mean Operator," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-25, July.
    16. Zhang-peng Tian & Jing Wang & Jian-qiang Wang & Hong-yu Zhang, 2017. "Simplified Neutrosophic Linguistic Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Approach to Green Product Development," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 597-627, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jjmath:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:1021280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1469 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.