Author
Listed:
- Joshua Ampofo
- Jiacheng Li
Abstract
This study investigates how community‐based climate adaptation education (CBCAE) is shaped, mediated and circulated across three Global South megacities, namely, Shanghai, São Paulo and Mumbai, between 2019 and 2025. Drawing on a mixed‐methods comparative design that combines document analysis of 148 policy and curricular texts, semi‐structured interviews with 72 educators and community organizers and a purpose‐built Knowledge Flow Intensity Index (KFII), the study traces the lateral pathways through which pedagogical strategies, curricular content and grassroots adaptation practices travel across these settings. The literature review was conducted through systematic searching of Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC and Google Scholar using multilingual search terms in English, Portuguese and Mandarin, supplemented by city‐to‐city cooperation studies and critical education research. The findings show that South–South knowledge circulation is mediated by diverse lines of pedagogical translation, policy adaptation and cultural contextualization, informed by local institutional legacies and community epistemologies. Shanghai demonstrates the strongest institutional scaffolding, São Paulo the deepest participatory pedagogy grounded in the Freirean tradition, and Mumbai foregrounds indigenous ecological knowledge. Differentiated circulation is proposed as a theoretical framework that reflects the multi‐directional, domain‐specific and transformative nature of lateral knowledge flows, extending prior circulation theory by specifying the mechanisms of transformation and providing a replicable quantitative instrument for their measurement. Implications for South–South educational cooperation, urban climate resilience policy and the epistemic politics of adaptation knowledge are discussed.
Suggested Citation
Joshua Ampofo & Jiacheng Li, 2026.
"South–South Knowledge Circulation: A Comparative Analysis of Community‐Based Climate Adaptation Education in Shanghai, São Paulo and Mumbai,"
Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(6), pages 1027-1044, August.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:38:y:2026:i:6:p:1027-1044
DOI: 10.1002/jid.70104
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:38:y:2026:i:6:p:1027-1044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.