IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v38y2026i4p754-769.html

North–South Asymmetries in Research Cited in Global South Policy Documents

Author

Listed:
  • Bernardo Cabral
  • Filipe Lage de Sousa
  • Luiza Amara Maciel Braga

Abstract

This article examines whose research is cited in economy‐related policy documents produced by organizations in countries of the Global South. Using Overton's Economy topic, we link 243 675 policy documents from 155 Global South countries to 68 550 Web of Science articles cited in those documents. We classify cited articles by country group, language, organizations and funders and use network measures to track changes in North–South collaboration over time. Approximately two‐thirds of the cited articles originate from institutions in the Global North. At the same time, the share of South‐only and North–South co‐authored articles rises after 2005, and several Global South countries move closer to the core of collaboration networks. The results also show a broad set of policy‐producing sources across Global South countries, but a much narrower set of research institutions and funders behind the cited literature. The study provides large‐scale evidence on persistent asymmetries in research visibility in policy citations, alongside a gradual increase in the presence of Global South research in written policy outputs.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernardo Cabral & Filipe Lage de Sousa & Luiza Amara Maciel Braga, 2026. "North–South Asymmetries in Research Cited in Global South Policy Documents," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 754-769, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:38:y:2026:i:4:p:754-769
    DOI: 10.1002/jid.70085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.70085
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jid.70085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:38:y:2026:i:4:p:754-769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.