IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v37y2025i7p1525-1542.html

Rethinking Competitiveness in the Age of AI: A Comparative Index‐Based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Geeho Jeon

Abstract

This study examines the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities on national competitiveness through a comparative analysis of the IMD World Competitiveness Index and three major AI indices: Oxford AI Readiness, Tortoise AI Index and Stanford AI Index. Utilizing correlation analysis, multiple regression and K‐means clustering across samples of 64, 59 and 35 countries, respectively, the research identifies infrastructure and research capacity as key predictors of national competitiveness, with regression models explaining 52.4%–60.8% of IMD variance and Pearson correlations exceeding 75% for predictive validity. Clustering analysis delineates AI‐advanced nations (A2 cluster) with superior AI performance relative to national competitiveness and resource‐dependent laggards (C2 cluster) at risk of stagnation without AI investment. The study proposes open innovation strategies, inspired by collaborative ecosystems like shared mobility, leveraging government‐industry‐academia partnerships and digital public infrastructure (DPI) to address gaps in government policy, research capacity and infrastructure, with case studies of the United States and Singapore. For Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a 2 × 2 strategy matrix outlines low‐cost, high‐impact AI initiatives to enable a bypass strategy, leveraging open innovation ecosystems to circumvent traditional industrial pathways. Findings underscore AI's transformative role in redefining competitiveness, driven by qualitative capabilities like efficiency, innovation and governance, offering actionable pathways for advanced economies and LDCs to close competitiveness gaps through strategic AI integration and DPI investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Geeho Jeon, 2025. "Rethinking Competitiveness in the Age of AI: A Comparative Index‐Based Approach," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(7), pages 1525-1542, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:37:y:2025:i:7:p:1525-1542
    DOI: 10.1002/jid.70018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.70018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jid.70018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozcelik, Emre & Taymaz, Erol, 2004. "Does innovativeness matter for international competitiveness in developing countries?: The case of Turkish manufacturing industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 409-424, April.
    2. David B. Audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann, 2017. "Economic performance and the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship: a comment," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1234-1235, October.
    3. Dong-Sung Cho & Hwy-Chang Moon, 2000. "From Adam Smith to Michael Porter:Evolution of Competitiveness Theory," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 4531.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adela Socol & Oana-Raluca Ivan & Adina Elena Danuletiu & Ionela Cornelia Cioca & Claudia Florina Botar & Dorina Elena Virdea, 2025. "The Moderating Role of Governmental Artificial Intelligence in Shaping Green Growth Dynamics in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-34, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Harris & John Moffat, 2011. "R&D, Innovation and Exporting," SERC Discussion Papers 0073, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. José Luis Massón-Guerra & Pedro Ortín-Ángel, 2021. "Correction to: Entrepreneurship capital spillovers at the local level," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1621-1621, October.
    3. Nur Hazelen Mat Rusok Author_Email: hazelen@kelantan.uitm.edu.my & Mohamed Husny Basir & PM Dr. Zainudin Awang & Farahiyah Akmal Mat Nawi, 2011. "The Influence Of Constructive Thought Pattern Strategies On Entrepreneur Innovative Behavior," Annual Summit on Business and Entrepreneurial Studies (ASBES 2011) Proceeding 2011-034-087, Conference Master Resources.
    4. Haddoud, Mohamed Yacine & Kock, Ned & Onjewu, Adah-Kole Emmanuel & Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid & Jones, Paul, 2023. "Technology, innovation and SMEs' export intensity: Evidence from Morocco," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Anna Kowalska & Jaroslav Kovarnik & Eva Hamplova & Pavel Prazak, 2018. "The Selected Topics for Comparison in Visegrad Four Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Pătărlăgeanu Simona Roxana & Apetrei Kalveram Andreea & Gheorghe Gavrilă Alina Florentina, 2025. "The role of competitiveness in increasing Romanian agri-food exports," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 20(4), pages 41-51.
    7. Horácio C. Faustino & Joana C. Lima & Pedro Verga Matos, 2012. "Exports, Productivity and Innovation: Evidence from Portugal using micro data," Working Papers Department of Economics 2012/13, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    8. Silveli Cristo-Andrade & João J. Ferreira & Arilda Teixeira & William C. McDowell, 2024. "Knowledge spillovers in business intelligence organisations: a strategic entrepreneurship perspective," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 733-759, June.
    9. Silveli Cristo-Andrade & João J. Ferreira, 2020. "Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship: what researches and approaches?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 263-286, March.
    10. Christopher F. Baum & Mustafa Caglayan & Oleksandr Talavera, 2016. "R&D Expenditures and Geographical Sales Diversification," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 84(2), pages 197-221, March.
    11. Karolina Pawlak & Luboš Smutka & Pavel Kotyza, 2021. "Agricultural Potential of the EU Countries: How Far Are They from the USA?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Magdalena Majchrzak & Aneta Ejsmont, 2023. "Competitiveness of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprisesin the German-Polish Border Area in Timesof Extraordinary Threats," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 247-267.
    13. Françoise Lemoine & Deniz Ünal-Kesenci, 2003. "Trade and Technology Transfers: a Comparative Study of Turkey, India and China," Working Papers 2003-16, CEPII research center.
    14. Fagerberg, Jan & Srholec, Martin & Verspagen, Bart, 2010. "Innovation and Economic Development," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 833-872, Elsevier.
    15. Sıdıka Başçı & Aysegül Durucan, 2017. "A Review of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Turkey," Yildiz Social Science Review, Yildiz Technical University, vol. 3(1), pages 59-80.
    16. Stephanie E. Mansion & Andreas Bausch, 2020. "Intangible assets and SMEs’ export behavior: a meta-analytical perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 727-760, October.
    17. Pindado, Emilio & Sánchez, Mercedes & García Martínez, Marian, 2023. "Entrepreneurial innovativeness: When too little or too much agglomeration hurts," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    18. Zhao, Zhen-yu & Ling, Wen-jun & Zillante, George & Zuo, Jian, 2012. "Comparative assessment of performance of foreign and local wind turbine manufacturers in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 424-432.
    19. Wei Mo & Jiumei Chen & Jing Shi & Yue Long, 2025. "Impact of government funding for science and technology on regional innovation capability: An empirical study on a key economic and technological innovation zone in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    20. El Elj, Moez, 2009. "R&D and Innovation Empirical Analysis for Tunisian Firms," MPRA Paper 18128, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:37:y:2025:i:7:p:1525-1542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.