IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jfutmk/v46y2026i7p1213-1233.html

Fund Extreme Performance and Heterogeneous Investor Choice: Evidence From Smart Beta ETFs

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoqun Liu
  • Youcong Chao
  • Yihao Huang
  • Hangjian Yu

Abstract

This study investigates how extreme return components (MAXs) of smart beta exchange‐traded funds (ETFs) influence heterogeneous investor choice. We find that extreme overnight returns (overnight MAXs) have substantial ETFs' flow predictability above and beyond that provided by standard risk, performance, and market‐timing measures. This suggests that individual investors tend to choose funds based on historical overnight MAXs. The persistence of overnight MAXs supports the lottery preference theory, which posits that retail investors disproportionately focus on the likelihood of high payoff states in a fund's past return distribution. Furthermore, we demonstrate that overnight and intraday MAXs negatively and positively predict future smart beta ETFs' performance, respectively. This divergence indicates that heterogeneous investors hold varying beliefs and employ distinct trading activities with respect to those lottery‐like fund return distributions. Finally, we show that investor attention is beneficial to explain our findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoqun Liu & Youcong Chao & Yihao Huang & Hangjian Yu, 2026. "Fund Extreme Performance and Heterogeneous Investor Choice: Evidence From Smart Beta ETFs," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(7), pages 1213-1233, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:46:y:2026:i:7:p:1213-1233
    DOI: 10.1002/fut.70105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.70105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/fut.70105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:46:y:2026:i:7:p:1213-1233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.