IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jfutmk/v46y2026i6p1053-1078.html

Why Do Hedgers Hedge? The Role of Ambiguity

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Höllmann

Abstract

This paper investigates whether ambiguity influences hedging behavior in commodity futures markets. Using high‐frequency crude oil futures data, distinct measures of risk and ambiguity are linked to weekly hedging positions from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The results show that ambiguity significantly affects hedging behavior beyond traditional risk measures. Importantly, different types of hedgers respond to ambiguity in opposing ways: Operational hedgers, who hedge direct exposure to physical prices, reduce their hedging pressure when facing ambiguity, while financial intermediaries, who hedge exposures from client contracts, increasing their hedging pressure. The findings are robust to alternative ambiguity measures, additional controls, and causal identification strategies. Instrument variable evidence supports the intermediary effects; for operational hedgers, results are directionally similar but not longer significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Höllmann, 2026. "Why Do Hedgers Hedge? The Role of Ambiguity," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(6), pages 1053-1078, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:46:y:2026:i:6:p:1053-1078
    DOI: 10.1002/fut.70098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.70098
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/fut.70098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:46:y:2026:i:6:p:1053-1078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.