IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jfutmk/v45y2025i9p1324-1342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Don't Farmers Use Futures and Options for Hedging? An Examination of Historical Basis Risk and Cash Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel L. Prager
  • Christopher B. Burns
  • Ryan Williams

Abstract

Agricultural producers face significant price risk, yet studies consistently find farmers use futures and options much less than predicted by optimal hedging models. Using nationally representative farm‐level data, we investigate two underexplored factors that can affect the use of exchange‐traded derivatives: historical basis risk and cash constraints. We show that corn and soybean farms located in counties that experienced a large, negative change in the corn basis between planting and harvest (a negative basis shock) in the last 5 years are less likely to use futures contracts (6–12 percentage points) and options contracts (3–18 percentage points), but have a greater likelihood of marketing contract use (14–24 percentage points). We also find that farms with greater cash constraints (lower cash holdings) are less likely to use futures and options. We show that crop insurance, storage, and cooperative membership are complementary when using futures and options.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel L. Prager & Christopher B. Burns & Ryan Williams, 2025. "Why Don't Farmers Use Futures and Options for Hedging? An Examination of Historical Basis Risk and Cash Constraints," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(9), pages 1324-1342, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:45:y:2025:i:9:p:1324-1342
    DOI: 10.1002/fut.22610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22610
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/fut.22610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:45:y:2025:i:9:p:1324-1342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.