IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jfutmk/v45y2025i12p2377-2402.html

Market Maker or Informed Trader: Who Drive the Relationship Between Option Trading and Underlying Returns? Evidence From Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 ETF Options

Author

Listed:
  • Haiqiang Chen
  • Zimin Cheng
  • Yingxing Li
  • Xiaoqun Liu

Abstract

Using option order imbalance as a proxy for market makers' inventory pressure, we identify a distinct return reversal pattern between option trading activity and underlying asset returns. Specifically, call (put) order imbalances are contemporaneously positively (negatively) associated with underlying returns, followed by rapid reversals in the subsequent period. This reversal stems primarily from temporary price pressures caused by market makers' delta‐hedging activities and remains robust after controlling for multiple factors and across various option classifications. Two empirical scenarios reinforce that option order imbalance reflects market makers' inventory risks rather than informed trading. Additional analyses—including event studies, out‐of‐sample tests, examinations of dynamic hedging behavior, and panel regressions with expanded SSE‐listed exchange traded fund option data—further substantiate these findings. Overall, our results emphasize the critical role of market makers as a noninformational trading channel, significantly shaping the relationship between option trading and underlying asset prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Haiqiang Chen & Zimin Cheng & Yingxing Li & Xiaoqun Liu, 2025. "Market Maker or Informed Trader: Who Drive the Relationship Between Option Trading and Underlying Returns? Evidence From Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 ETF Options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(12), pages 2377-2402, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:45:y:2025:i:12:p:2377-2402
    DOI: 10.1002/fut.70038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.70038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/fut.70038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:45:y:2025:i:12:p:2377-2402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.