IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jfutmk/v45y2025i10p1818-1851.html

Lottery Preference and Skewness Risk Premium: Evidence From the Chinese Market

Author

Listed:
  • Xianjing Zhou
  • Tai‐Yong Roh
  • Yahua Xu

Abstract

This study investigates the pricing of skewness risk in cross‐sectional returns in the Chinese stock market, considering the substantial presence of retail investors and their potential lottery‐related preferences. We decompose the total implied skewness, derived from the Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 exchange‐traded fund options, into upper and lower components. Our findings reveal that the upper implied skewness carries a significantly negative price, whereas the lower implied skewness is positively but only weakly priced. The opposite predictability resolves the pricing puzzle associated with total implied skewness, which exhibits negligible cross‐sectional predictability. The negative premium associated with upper skewness is attributed to retail investors' lottery preferences, as stocks exposed to higher upper skewness risk tend to perform well during right‐tail market events. This behavioral interpretation is further supported by evidence showing that the negative premium on upper implied skewness is most pronounced during high‐sentiment periods, even after controlling for standard risk factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianjing Zhou & Tai‐Yong Roh & Yahua Xu, 2025. "Lottery Preference and Skewness Risk Premium: Evidence From the Chinese Market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(10), pages 1818-1851, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:45:y:2025:i:10:p:1818-1851
    DOI: 10.1002/fut.70012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.70012
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/fut.70012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Han, Bing & Kumar, Alok, 2013. "Speculative Retail Trading and Asset Prices," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 377-404, April.
    2. Soumaya Yaakoubi, 2024. "Investor sentiment and skewness risk premium," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(35), pages 4194-4208, July.
    3. Jennifer Conrad & Robert F. Dittmar & Eric Ghysels, 2013. "Ex Ante Skewness and Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(1), pages 85-124, February.
    4. Alex Frino & Grace Lepone & Danika Wright, 2019. "Are paper winners gamblers? Evidence from Australian retail investors," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(S1), pages 593-614, April.
    5. Bevilacqua, Mattia & Tunaru, Radu, 2021. "The SKEW index: Extracting what has been left," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    6. Nicholas Barberis & Ming Huang, 2008. "Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(5), pages 2066-2100, December.
    7. Carhart, Mark M, 1997. "On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 57-82, March.
    8. Yuqing Feng & Mengxi He & Yaojie Zhang, 2024. "Market Skewness and Stock Return Predictability: New Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(2), pages 233-244, January.
    9. Zhen, Fang, 2025. "Market volatility and skewness risks in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Ming Gu & Yi Hu & Zhitao Xiong, 2025. "Dissecting the lottery‐like anomaly: Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(1), pages 883-911, March.
    11. Guojin Chen & Jie Ding & Xiangqin Zhao, 2019. "A lottery-preference-based explanation of realized kurtosis puzzle in Chinese stock market," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(50), pages 5466-5481, October.
    12. Chang, Bo Young & Christoffersen, Peter & Jacobs, Kris, 2013. "Market skewness risk and the cross section of stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 46-68.
    13. Bevilacqua, Mattia & Tunaru, Radu, 2021. "The SKEW index: extracting what has been left," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108198, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Chin‐Ho Chen, 2021. "Investor sentiment, misreaction, and the skewness‐return relationship," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(9), pages 1427-1455, September.
    15. Xiao, Jihong & Jiang, Jiajie & Zhang, Yaojie, 2024. "Policy uncertainty, investor sentiment, and good and bad volatilities in the stock market: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    16. Conrad, Jennifer & Kapadia, Nishad & Xing, Yuhang, 2014. "Death and jackpot: Why do individual investors hold overpriced stocks?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 455-475.
    17. Benjamin M. Blau, 2017. "Skewness preferences, asset prices and investor sentiment," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 812-822, February.
    18. Asgar Ali & K. N. Badhani, 2023. "Tail risk, beta anomaly, and demand for lottery: what explains cross-sectional variations in equity returns?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 775-804, August.
    19. Liu, Chang & Sun, Peng & Zhu, Dongming, 2023. "Lottery preference, short-sale constraint, and the salience effect: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    20. Eraker, Bjørn & Ready, Mark, 2015. "Do investors overpay for stocks with lottery-like payoffs? An examination of the returns of OTC stocks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(3), pages 486-504.
    21. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
    22. Tong Suk Kim & Heewoo Park, 2018. "Is stock return predictability of option‐implied skewness affected by the market state?," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(9), pages 1024-1042, September.
    23. Alok Kumar, 2009. "Who Gambles in the Stock Market?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(4), pages 1889-1933, August.
    24. Tingting Zhang & Mengyao Song & Kaixin Li & Zhifeng Liu, 2021. "Lottery preference and stock market return: Chinese evidence using daily and provincial data," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(18), pages 1582-1588, October.
    25. Wang, Zhuo & Wang, Ziyue & Wu, Ke, 2023. "The role of anchoring on investors’ gambling preference: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    26. Li An & Huijun Wang & Jian Wang & Jianfeng Yu, 2020. "Lottery-Related Anomalies: The Role of Reference-Dependent Preferences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 473-501, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Byun, Suk-Joon & Kim, Da-Hea, 2016. "Gambling preference and individual equity option returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 155-174.
    2. Wang, Xiaoxiao, 2024. "Bank affiliation and lottery-like characteristics of mutual funds," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 944-963.
    3. Mei-Chen Lin, 2020. "When analysts encounter lottery-like stocks: lottery-like stocks and analyst stock recommendations," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 327-353, July.
    4. Chen, Chen & Cohen, Andrew & Liang, Qiqi & Sun, Licheng, 2025. "Maxing out short-term reversals in weekly stock returns," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Xu, Zhongxiang & Li, Xiafei & Chevapatrakul, Thanaset & Gao, Ning, 2022. "Default risk, macroeconomic conditions, and the market skewness risk premium," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    6. Doina C. Chichernea & Haimanot Kassa & Steve L. Slezak, 2019. "Lottery preferences and the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 25(3), pages 655-683, June.
    7. Liu, Bibo & Wang, Huijun & Yu, Jianfeng & Zhao, Shen, 2020. "Time-varying demand for lottery: Speculation ahead of earnings announcements," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 789-817.
    8. Seema REHMAN & Saqib SHARIF & Wali ULLAH, 2021. "Higher Realized Moments and Stock Return Predictability," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 48-70, December.
    9. Berggrun, Luis & Cardona, Emilio & Lizarzaburu, Edmundo, 2019. "Extreme daily returns and the cross-section of expected returns: Evidence from Brazil," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 201-211.
    10. Li, Xiaowei & Wu, Zhengyu & Zhang, Hao & Zhang, Lu, 2024. "Risk-neutral skewness and stock market returns: A time-series analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Kelley Bergsma & Jitendra Tayal, 2019. "Short Interest and Lottery Stocks," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 48(1), pages 187-227, March.
    12. Del Viva, Luca & Kasanen, Eero & Saunders, Anthony & Trigeorgis, Lenos, 2021. "US government TARP bailout and bank lottery behavior," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    13. Lin, Mei-Chen & Lin, Yu-Ling, 2021. "Idiosyncratic skewness and cross-section of stock returns: Evidence from Taiwan," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Huang, Helen Hui & Sun, Jianchun & Zhang, Shunming, 2024. "Asset pricing for the lottery-like security under probability weighting: Based on generalized Wang transform," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Wei Tang & Tianhao Wu & Liheng Xu, 2017. "Skewness Preference and IPO Anomalies in China," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 18(1), pages 173-199, May.
    16. Zhu, Hongbing & Yang, Lihua & Xu, Changxin, 2023. "Tracking investor gambling intensity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    17. Zhong, Angel & Gray, Philip, 2016. "The MAX effect: An exploration of risk and mispricing explanations," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 76-90.
    18. Xu, Zhongxiang & Chevapatrakul, Thanaset & Li, Xiafei, 2019. "Return asymmetry and the cross section of stock returns," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 93-110.
    19. Wang, Zhuo & Wang, Ziyue & Wu, Ke, 2023. "The role of anchoring on investors’ gambling preference: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Lu, Jing & Ran, Rong & Ko, Kuan-Cheng & Yang, Nien-Tzu, 2025. "Asset pricing when social preference meets lottery preference: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:45:y:2025:i:10:p:1818-1851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.