IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jfutmk/v33y2013i5p397-420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Makes Markets? Liquidity Providers Versus Algorithmic Traders

Author

Listed:
  • Joon Chae
  • Jaeuk Khil
  • Eun Jung Lee

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Joon Chae & Jaeuk Khil & Eun Jung Lee, 2013. "Who Makes Markets? Liquidity Providers Versus Algorithmic Traders," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 397-420, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:33:y:2013:i:5:p:397-420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yue Zhao & Difang Wan, 2018. "Institutional high frequency trading and price discovery: Evidence from an emerging commodity futures market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 243-270, February.
    2. Viktor Manahov, 2018. "The rise of the machines in commodities markets: new evidence obtained using Strongly Typed Genetic Programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 260(1), pages 321-352, January.
    3. Viktor Manahov, 2021. "High‐frequency trading order cancellations and market quality: Is stricter regulation the answer?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5385-5407, October.
    4. Eun Jung Lee, 2015. "High Frequency Trading in the Korean Index Futures Market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 31-51, January.
    5. Xuejun Jin & Jingyu Zhao & Xingguo Luo, 2022. "Why are the prices of European‐style derivatives greater than the prices of American‐style derivatives?," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(9), pages 1772-1793, September.
    6. Ya‐Kai Chang & Robin K. Chou, 2022. "Algorithmic trading and market quality: Evidence from the Taiwan index futures market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(10), pages 1837-1855, October.
    7. Atilgan, Yigit & Demirtas, K. Ozgur & Simsek, Koray D., 2016. "Derivative markets in emerging economies: A survey," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 88-102.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:33:y:2013:i:5:p:397-420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.