IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jfutmk/v20y2000i7p625-659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing American options with stochastic volatility: Evidence from S&P 500 futures options

Author

Listed:
  • Lim Kian Guan
  • Guo Xiaoqiang

Abstract

This article is the first attempt to test empirically a numerical solution to price American options under stochastic volatility. The model allows for a mean‐reverting stochastic‐volatility process with non‐zero risk premium for the volatility risk and correlation with the underlying process. A general solution of risk‐neutral probabilities and price movements is derived, which avoids the common negative‐probability problem in numerical‐option pricing with stochastic volatility. The empirical test shows clear evidence supporting the occurrence of stochastic volatility. The stochastic‐volatility model outperforms the constant‐volatility model by producing smaller bias and better goodness of fit in both the in‐sample and out‐of‐sample test. It not only eliminates systematic moneyness bias produced by the constant‐volatility model, but also has better prediction power. In addition, both models perform well in the dynamic intraday hedging test. However, the constant‐volatility model seems to have a slightly better hedging effectiveness. The profitability test shows that the stochastic volatility is able to capture statistically significant profits while the constant volatility model produces losses. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 20:625–659, 2000

Suggested Citation

  • Lim Kian Guan & Guo Xiaoqiang, 2000. "Pricing American options with stochastic volatility: Evidence from S&P 500 futures options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(7), pages 625-659, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:20:y:2000:i:7:p:625-659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emilio Russo & Alessandro Staino, 2018. "A Lattice-Based Model For Evaluating Bonds And Interest-Sensitive Claims Under Stochastic Volatility," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(04), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Maya Briani & Lucia Caramellino & Antonino Zanette, 2017. "A hybrid approach for the implementation of the Heston model," Post-Print hal-00916440, HAL.
    3. Chou-Wen Wang & Ting-Yi Wu, 2007. "An Alternative Formulation for the Pricing of Stock Index Futures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 6(2), pages 121-134, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:20:y:2000:i:7:p:625-659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.