IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jfutmk/v11y1991i5p613-621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A GARCH examination of the relationship between volume and price variability in futures markets

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Majand
  • Kenneth Yung

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Majand & Kenneth Yung, 1991. "A GARCH examination of the relationship between volume and price variability in futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(5), pages 613-621, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:11:y:1991:i:5:p:613-621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Litimi, Houda & BenSaïda, Ahmed & Bouraoui, Omar, 2016. "Herding and excessive risk in the American stock market: A sectoral analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 6-21.
    2. SENARATHNE W Chamil & JIANGUO Wei, 2018. "Do Investors Mimic Trading Strategies Of Foreign Investors Or The Market: Implications For Capital Asset Pricing," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 13(3), pages 171-205, December.
    3. Sangram K. Jena, 2016. "Sequential Information Arrival Hypothesis: More Evidence from the Indian Derivatives Market," Vision, , vol. 20(2), pages 101-110, June.
    4. H. Kent Baker & Satish Kumar & Nitesh Pandey, 2021. "Forty years of the Journal of Futures Markets: A bibliometric overview," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(7), pages 1027-1054, July.
    5. Talla M Aldeehani, 2019. "Have Stock Markets Become Less Volatile After the Great Recession?," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 10-25, December.
    6. Daniel FS Choi & Victor Fang & Tian Yong Fu, 2009. "Volatility spillovers between New Zealand stock market returns and exchange rate changes before and after the 1997 Asian financial crisis," Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, Macrothink Institute, vol. 1(2), pages 106117-1061, December.
    7. Doojin RYU & Hyein SHIM, 2017. "Intraday Dynamics of Asset Returns, Trading Activities, and Implied Volatilities: A Trivariate GARCH Framework," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 45-61, June.
    8. BenSaïda, Ahmed, 2017. "Herding effect on idiosyncratic volatility in U.S. industries," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 121-132.
    9. Doina Chichernea & Kershen Huang & Alex Petkevich, 2019. "Does maturity matter? The case of treasury futures volume," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(10), pages 1301-1321, October.
    10. Daouda Lawa tan Toe & Salifou Ouedraogo, 2022. "Dynamic relationship between trading volume, returns and returns volatility: an empirical investigation on the main African’s stock markets," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(5), pages 429-444, September.
    11. Apostolos Serletis & Asghar Shahmoradi, 2007. "Returns and Volatility in the NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Market," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Quantitative And Empirical Analysis Of Energy Markets, chapter 15, pages 193-204, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Pramod Kumar Naik & Puja Padhi, 2015. "Stock Market Volatility and Equity Trading Volume: Empirical Examination from Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC)," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(5_suppl), pages 28-45, October.
    13. Alizadeh, Amir H. & Tamvakis, Michael, 2016. "Market conditions, trader types and price–volume relation in energy futures markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 134-149.
    14. Sibel ?EL?K, 2013. "New Evidence on the Relation between Trading Volume and Volatility," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(1), pages 176-186, June.
    15. David McMillan & Alan Speight, 2002. "Return-volume dynamics in UK futures," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(10), pages 707-713.
    16. Pramod Kumar Naik & Rangan Gupta & Puja Padhi, 2018. "The Relationship Between Stock Market Volatility And Trading Volume: Evidence From South Africa," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 52(1), pages 99-114, January-M.
    17. Park, Beum-Jo, 2022. "The COVID-19 pandemic, volatility, and trading behavior in the bitcoin futures market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    18. Ana-Maria Fuertes & Elena Kalotychou & Natasa Todorovic, 2015. "Daily volume, intraday and overnight returns for volatility prediction: profitability or accuracy?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 251-278, August.
    19. Ekong, Christopher N. & Onye, Kenneth U., 2017. "Application of Garch Models to Estimate and Predict Financial Volatility of Daily Stock Returns in Nigeria," MPRA Paper 88309, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Olivier Damette & Beum-Jo Park, 2015. "Tobin Tax and Volatility: A Threshold Quantile Autoregressive Regression Framework," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(5), pages 996-1022, November.
    21. Niklas Wagner & Terry Marsh, 2005. "Surprise volume and heteroskedasticity in equity market returns," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 153-168.
    22. Karima Saci, 2022. "Modelling the Relationship Between Trading Volume and Stock Returns Volatility for Islamic and Conventional Banks: The Case of Saudi Arabia نمذجة العلاقة بين حجم التداول وتقلب عوائد الأسهم للبنوك الإس," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 35(1), pages 41-55, January.
    23. Saswat Patra & Malay Bhattacharyya, 2021. "Does volume really matter? A risk management perspective using cross‐country evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 118-135, January.
    24. Degiannakis, Stavros & Xekalaki, Evdokia, 2004. "Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (ARCH) Models: A Review," MPRA Paper 80487, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    25. Chandrasekhar Krishnamurti & Gary Tian & Min Xu & Guangchuan Li, 2013. "No news is not good news: evidence from the intra-day return volatility–volume relationship in Shanghai Stock Exchange," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 149-167.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:11:y:1991:i:5:p:613-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.