IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jforec/v45y2026i5p2266-2299.html

Forecasting Corporate Default Risk Across Multiple Horizons With Interpretable Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Qingli Dong
  • Li Li

Abstract

Accurate and transparent default prediction is central to credit‐risk operations and policy. This paper proposes ELG, an interpretable two‐stage machine‐learning framework for decision support in corporate default prediction. Stage I uses an explainable, sparsity‐controlled selector (E‐LassoNet) to produce a compact, auditable feature set; Stage II fits a gradient‐boosting model (GBDT) on the retained drivers to capture residual nonlinearity and output multi‐horizon default probabilities. Using a large firm‐year panel of Chinese listed companies and evaluating six forecast horizons, ELG achieves AUCs in the 0.98–0.99 range and Recalls in the 0.94–0.99 range with 27–28 predictors and outperforms standard classifiers on AUC and G_mean at most horizons. Post‐analysis shows financial signals dominate short horizons, while governance and other non‐financial indicators grow in importance at longer horizons. By enforcing interpretability ex ante and evaluating with decision‐aligned metrics, ELG links transparent feature selection to actionable, horizon‐aware forecasts, improving deployability and governance for credit‐risk management in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingli Dong & Li Li, 2026. "Forecasting Corporate Default Risk Across Multiple Horizons With Interpretable Machine Learning," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(5), pages 2266-2299, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:45:y:2026:i:5:p:2266-2299
    DOI: 10.1002/for.70129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.70129
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/for.70129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:45:y:2026:i:5:p:2266-2299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/2966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.