IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jforec/v45y2026i4p1495-1510.html

Parametric Quantile Regression Using Mixture Distributions: Estimating Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall

Author

Listed:
  • Song Shi
  • Xinyu Wang

Abstract

Classical quantile regression has an asymmetric absolute error loss function with no derivative at the origin, making parameter estimation difficult. By setting the residual to follow an asymmetric Laplace distribution, quantile regression becomes an equivalent parametric model. However, the asymmetric Laplace distribution does not fit the distribution of asset returns, which is characterized by sharp peaks and heavy tails. To better fit the residuals, we design some general flexible error distributions via mixture distributions whose quantile at a given level is zero. We then propose a novel parametric dynamic quantile regression model using these distributions. It has a smooth loss function, which allows us to apply the maximum likelihood approach to estimate parameters easily. We demonstrate the validity of our model through a risk management application. It has the unique advantage of providing the analytical formulae for value at risk and expected shortfall over other risk measure models. An empirical study of stock markets in 25 countries shows that our model outperforms benchmark models in backtesting out‐of‐sample forecasts of value at risk and expected shortfall.

Suggested Citation

  • Song Shi & Xinyu Wang, 2026. "Parametric Quantile Regression Using Mixture Distributions: Estimating Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(4), pages 1495-1510, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:45:y:2026:i:4:p:1495-1510
    DOI: 10.1002/for.70103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.70103
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/for.70103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wan, Li & Han, Liyan & Xu, Yang & Matousek, Roman, 2021. "Dynamic linkage between the Chinese and global stock markets: A normal mixture approach," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Ghysels, Eric & Santa-Clara, Pedro & Valkanov, Rossen, 2006. "Predicting volatility: getting the most out of return data sampled at different frequencies," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1-2), pages 59-95.
    3. Paul H. Kupiec, 1995. "Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 95-24, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    4. Cathy W. S. Chen & Takaaki Koike & Wei‐Hsuan Shau, 2024. "Tail risk forecasting with semiparametric regression models by incorporating overnight information," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1492-1512, August.
    5. Qifa Xu & Lu Chen & Cuixia Jiang & Yezheng Liu, 2022. "Forecasting expected shortfall and value at risk with a joint elicitable mixed data sampling model," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 407-421, April.
    6. Eric Ghysels & Alberto Plazzi & Rossen Valkanov, 2016. "Why Invest in Emerging Markets? The Role of Conditional Return Asymmetry," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 71(5), pages 2145-2192, October.
    7. Marc S. Paolella, 2015. "Multivariate asset return prediction with mixture models," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(13-14), pages 1214-1252, November.
    8. Trung H. Le, 2024. "Forecasting VaR and ES in emerging markets: The role of time‐varying higher moments," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 402-414, March.
    9. Emese Lazar & Carol Alexander, 2006. "Normal mixture GARCH(1,1): applications to exchange rate modelling," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(3), pages 307-336.
    10. Diebold, Francis X & Gunther, Todd A & Tay, Anthony S, 1998. "Evaluating Density Forecasts with Applications to Financial Risk Management," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 39(4), pages 863-883, November.
    11. Le, Trung H., 2020. "Forecasting value at risk and expected shortfall with mixed data sampling," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1362-1379.
    12. Hamilton, James D, 1991. "A Quasi-Bayesian Approach to Estimating Parameters for Mixtures of Normal Distributions," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 9(1), pages 27-39, January.
    13. Buckley, Ian & Saunders, David & Seco, Luis, 2008. "Portfolio optimization when asset returns have the Gaussian mixture distribution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1434-1461, March.
    14. Robert F. Engle & Simone Manganelli, 2004. "CAViaR: Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk by Regression Quantiles," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 22, pages 367-381, October.
    15. Acereda, Beatriz & Leon, Angel & Mora, Juan, 2020. "Estimating the expected shortfall of cryptocurrencies: An evaluation based on backtesting," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    16. Bhat, Harish S. & Kumar, Nitesh, 2012. "Option pricing under a normal mixture distribution derived from the Markov tree model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 762-774.
    17. James W. Taylor, 2019. "Forecasting Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Using a Semiparametric Approach Based on the Asymmetric Laplace Distribution," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 121-133, January.
    18. Tucker, Alan L, 1992. "A Reexamination of Finite- and Infinite-Variance Distributions as Models of Daily Stock Returns," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 10(1), pages 73-81, January.
    19. Guanghui Cai & Zhimin Wu & Lei Peng, 2021. "Forecasting volatility with outliers in Realized GARCH models," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 667-685, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Wang & Yongqiao Wang, 2025. "Forecasting Expected Shortfall and Value‐at‐Risk With Cross‐Sectional Aggregation," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 391-423, March.
    2. Shi, Song & Wang, Xinyu, 2026. "Can energy commodities hedge EU emission allowance futures? Evidence from time-varying copulas using mixture marginal distributions," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Le, Trung H., 2020. "Forecasting value at risk and expected shortfall with mixed data sampling," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1362-1379.
    4. Zhimin Wu & Guanghui Cai, 2024. "Can intraday data improve the joint estimation and prediction of risk measures? Evidence from a variety of realized measures," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1956-1974, September.
    5. Xu, Qifa & Chen, Lu & Jiang, Cuixia & Yu, Keming, 2020. "Mixed data sampling expectile regression with applications to measuring financial risk," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 469-486.
    6. Qifa Xu & Lu Chen & Cuixia Jiang & Yezheng Liu, 2022. "Forecasting expected shortfall and value at risk with a joint elicitable mixed data sampling model," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 407-421, April.
    7. Wan, Li & Han, Liyan & Xu, Yang & Matousek, Roman, 2021. "Dynamic linkage between the Chinese and global stock markets: A normal mixture approach," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    8. Rita Pimentel & Morten Risstad & Sjur Westgaard, 2022. "Predicting interest rate distributions using PCA & quantile regression," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 291-311, December.
    9. Zhang, Ning & Su, Xiaoman & Qi, Shuyuan, 2023. "An empirical investigation of multiperiod tail risk forecasting models," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. Merlo, Luca & Petrella, Lea & Raponi, Valentina, 2021. "Forecasting VaR and ES using a joint quantile regression and its implications in portfolio allocation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Timo Dimitriadis & Marius Puke, 2026. "Statistical Inference for Score Decompositions," Papers 2603.04275, arXiv.org.
    12. Xu, Yang & Han, Liyan & Wan, Li & Yin, Libo, 2019. "Dynamic link between oil prices and exchange rates: A non-linear approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Luca Merlo & Lea Petrella & Valentina Raponi, 2021. "Forecasting VaR and ES using a joint quantile regression and implications in portfolio allocation," Papers 2106.06518, arXiv.org.
    14. Lin, Edward M.H. & Sun, Edward W. & Yu, Min-Teh, 2020. "Behavioral data-driven analysis with Bayesian method for risk management of financial services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    15. Gerlach, Richard & Wang, Chao, 2020. "Semi-parametric dynamic asymmetric Laplace models for tail risk forecasting, incorporating realized measures," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 489-506.
    16. Yun Feng & Weijie Hou & Yuping Song, 2024. "Tail risk forecasting and its application to margin requirements in the commodity futures market," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1513-1529, August.
    17. Samir Saissi Hassani & Georges Dionne, 2021. "The New International Regulation of Market Risk: Roles of VaR and CVaR in Model Validation," Working Papers 21-1, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    18. Jiménez, Inés & Mora-Valencia, Andrés & Perote, Javier, 2022. "Semi-nonparametric risk assessment with cryptocurrencies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    19. Alfonso Novales & Laura Garcia-Jorcano, 2019. "Backtesting Extreme Value Theory models of expected shortfall," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2019-24, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    20. Timo Dimitriadis & iaochun Liu & Julie Schnaitmann, 2023. "Encompassing Tests for Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Multistep Forecasts Based on Inference on the Boundary," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 412-444.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:45:y:2026:i:4:p:1495-1510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/2966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.