IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intssr/v66y2013i1p1-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Achilles' heel of scale service design in social security administration: The case of the United Kingdom's Universal Credit

Author

Listed:
  • John Seddon
  • Brendan O'Donovan

Abstract

This article takes a critical view of the United Kingdom government's design for the delivery of the Universal Credit (UC) benefit reforms. It is argued that the UC is destined to fail because of the policy's extension into specifying the means (“digital by default”) of delivery for such services. The authors argue that an unseen but ubiquitous set of “scale” management assumptions has been allowed to infiltrate the means by which the government intends to enact its headline policy objective to “make work pay”. Following Seddon's “Vanguard Method”, a practical example of how a better service was designed in a local authority housing benefits service is then examined. Results from this service include being able to deal with up to 50 per cent more demand, with fewer resources, in half the official target time. Finally, the article will conclude with a call for more evidence‐based policy.

Suggested Citation

  • John Seddon & Brendan O'Donovan, 2013. "The Achilles' heel of scale service design in social security administration: The case of the United Kingdom's Universal Credit," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(1), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:66:y:2013:i:1:p:1-23
    DOI: 10.1111/issr.12000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12000
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/issr.12000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:66:y:2013:i:1:p:1-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1865-1674 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.