IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intssr/v50y1997i4p29-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The social protection of the unemployed

Author

Listed:
  • Jef Van Langendonck

Abstract

Unemployment is the most basic risk covered by social security. Sickness, accident, maternity, incapacity, old age or even death can be considered as special cases of interruption of earnings. Unemployment is the standard case, where a worker loses earnings simply because he or she is unable to find gainful employment, without reference to any particular causality. Nevertheless, the unemployment branch is very often treated rather poorly, in comparison with other branches of social security. In most countries – except the United Kingdom – it was created much later than other branches, and it involves a larger part of assistance, as opposed to insurance. Usually, fewer people are covered against the risk, the conditions for entitlement are stricter, the benefits tend to be lower and shorter in duration, and controls and sanctions are more severe.1 People are generally worse off when their loss of earnings is the result of a dismissal rather than disease or accident. In this contribution we try to analyse the reasons why unemployment has such a relatively poor status in social security. And we examine the extent to which this difference of treatment can be considered a form of discrimination and, in some cases, contrary to the basic principles of international social law.

Suggested Citation

  • Jef Van Langendonck, 1997. "The social protection of the unemployed," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(4), pages 29-41, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:50:y:1997:i:4:p:29-41
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.1997.tb01082.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246X.1997.tb01082.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-246X.1997.tb01082.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:50:y:1997:i:4:p:29-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1865-1674 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.