IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intssr/v47y1994i1p15-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing disability: A six‐nation study of disability pension claim processing and appeals

Author

Listed:
  • Frank S. Bloch

Abstract

This article studies disability pension benefit claim processing and appeal procedures in six countries — the United Kingdom, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, the United States of America, and Canada. It examines eligibility requirements and programme goals, focusing on how those countries assess a claimant's disability. Among these six countries, there were variations between the burdens on the agency and those on the claimant to compile evidence to support the claim. In addition, the use of agency doctors, or referrals to outside physicians, was often predictive of how this burden was distributed. The countries use similar procedures to make initial disability assessments; however, they differ in how they structure the process: whether it is centralized or decentralized, whether teams or individual decision makers are used, and whether the decision makers have specialized training or rely on experts. The study also notes variations in the appeals process. All countries have considered adopting or discarding an internal administrative review of eligibility decisions; the debate continues on whether an internal review is of any value. With or without it, all six countries allow at least one level of appeal on both factual and legal issues. Some countries use specialized tribunals, while others use courts to hear post‐agency appeals. The article concludes with observations and recommendations applicable generally to disability pension benefit claim processing and appeals.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank S. Bloch, 1994. "Assessing disability: A six‐nation study of disability pension claim processing and appeals," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 15-35, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:47:y:1994:i:1:p:15-35
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.1994.tb01098.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246X.1994.tb01098.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-246X.1994.tb01098.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:47:y:1994:i:1:p:15-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1865-1674 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.