IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intsec/v21y2026i2p147-162.html

Soft Power in Trade: Quantifying the Impact of Confucius Institutes on China's Exports

Author

Listed:
  • Renjing Chen
  • Wei Jin
  • Tangrui Yang

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of Confucius Institutes (CIs) as a form of China's cultural diplomacy and their impact on international trade, particularly exports. Using a gravity model, we analyze data from 1990 to 2019 across countries, finding that the presence of CIs significantly boosts China's exports. Robustness checks confirm this effect across various specifications, including imports and sector‐level data. Mechanism analysis reveals that CIs enhance China's image, increasing trade by fostering positive perceptions abroad. The study further identifies pronounced trade effects in high‐income nations, and regions with shorter cultural distance from China. Our findings suggest that cultural output via Confucius Institutes not only advances China's soft power but also serves as a strategic tool to promote trade globally, with differentiated goods benefiting the most.

Suggested Citation

  • Renjing Chen & Wei Jin & Tangrui Yang, 2026. "Soft Power in Trade: Quantifying the Impact of Confucius Institutes on China's Exports," International Studies of Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(2), pages 147-162, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:intsec:v:21:y:2026:i:2:p:147-162
    DOI: 10.1002/ise3.70008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ise3.70008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ise3.70008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intsec:v:21:y:2026:i:2:p:147-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.