Author
Listed:
- Srishti Minocha
- Sukanya Das
- Upasna Sharma
Abstract
Climate change has emerged as a critical barrier to economic development, prompting a global shift toward low‐carbon energy systems. For India, whose economy remains heavily reliant on coal, this transition entails complex socioeconomic and institutional challenges related to energy security, livelihoods, and regional dependence. This study assesses India's readiness for a just energy transition by engaging purposively selected respondents from government, research, and civil society sectors. Employing a justice framework that encompasses distributional, recognition, and procedural dimensions, a thematic‐analytical approach is used to examine the challenges, opportunities, and impacts shaping India's coal transition. The findings indicate that concerns of distributional justice, particularly the invisibility of informal labor and regional economic dependency, dominate stakeholder perceptions but are closely intertwined with recognition and procedural deficits. Weak procedural inclusion and limited recognition of informal actors reinforce inequities in benefit distribution, highlighting institutional barriers within India's transition architecture. Simultaneously, emerging opportunities through technological innovation, green finance, and inclusive governance hold potential to enhance fairness and resilience, provided they are effectively institutionalized. This study contributes to Global South energy justice debates by offering an analytical understanding of how informality and institutional inertia shape transition outcomes. It underscores that embedding justice principles within governance and policy frameworks through coordination, participatory mechanisms, and targeted inclusion of informal workers is essential for achieving an equitable and sustainable low‐carbon future.
Suggested Citation
Srishti Minocha & Sukanya Das & Upasna Sharma, 2025.
"Energy Justice in Transition: Perceptions From India's Coal‐Dependent Regions,"
International Studies of Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 490-501, December.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:intsec:v:20:y:2025:i:4:p:490-501
DOI: 10.1002/ise3.70025
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intsec:v:20:y:2025:i:4:p:490-501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.