IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intnem/v28y2018i3ne2017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of monitoring and multipath support on top of OpenFlow specification

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro H. A. Rezende
  • Paulo R. S. L. Coelho
  • Luis F. Faina
  • Lasaro J. Camargos
  • Rafael Pasquini

Abstract

In general, traffic is pushed through a single path despite the existence of alternative paths in networks. For example, routing solutions based on spanning tree prune the topology to prevent loops, consequently preventing also the use of alternative paths. Research on quality of service frequently advocates that the use of alternative paths is interesting for enforcing Service Level Agreements (SLAs), bypassing bottlenecks created by shortest paths. In this paper, we are interested in analyzing the support for monitoring network traffic and for provisioning of multipaths in software‐defined networking (SDN), given the strong platform it provides for experimentation of new networked solutions. Our approach firstly enriches the topology view at the control plane with data gathered through fine grain data plane monitoring. On the basis of such enriched view, our system determines the path, or multipaths, necessary to enforce the specified SLA. We propose 2 extension modules to an OpenFlow controller: SDNMon, which monitors the data plane to enrich the topology information at the control plane, and MP‐Routing, which determines a set of paths, in the absence of a single path capable of enforcing the SLA. Both modules are extensively evaluated, and the results not only demonstrate what can be achieved in terms of accuracy in SDNMon and in terms of quality of service benefits in MP‐Routing but also highlight some limitations of OpenFlow specification. On the basis of our findings, we propose a set of new counters to Per Port and Per Flow granularity levels of OpenFlow specification.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro H. A. Rezende & Paulo R. S. L. Coelho & Luis F. Faina & Lasaro J. Camargos & Rafael Pasquini, 2018. "Analysis of monitoring and multipath support on top of OpenFlow specification," International Journal of Network Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:intnem:v:28:y:2018:i:3:n:e2017
    DOI: 10.1002/nem.2017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.2017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nem.2017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intnem:v:28:y:2018:i:3:n:e2017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1190 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.