IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ijfiec/v31y2026i3p4002-4015.html

Green Finance, Biased Technical Progress and Carbon Reduction From the Perspective of Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Danyang Di
  • Guoxiang Li
  • Zhiyang Shen
  • Malin Song

Abstract

The early realisation of carbon peaking and the reduction of carbon peaks in high‐carbon regions are top priorities for achieving ‘dual carbon’ goals. Green finance (GRF) provides an important instrument for strengthening financial support for the low‐carbon transition in high‐carbon regions. This paper examines how GRFs can mitigate carbon inequality from the perspectives of capital‐ and energy‐biased technical progress. The study revealed that the GRF helps reduce carbon emissions and alleviate carbon inequality, as it enhances more active carbon reduction behaviours in high‐carbon regions. The greater the degree of market incentives, environmental protection supervision and carbon inequality, the greater the strengthening of the reduction effect of GRFs on high‐carbon regions, thus narrowing the interregional carbon emission gap. GRF development can significantly improve capital‐biased and energy‐biased technical progress, enhance the advantage of carbon reduction in high‐carbon regions and alleviate carbon inequality. We provide theoretical support for the direction of technical progress by relying on factor endowment advantages.

Suggested Citation

  • Danyang Di & Guoxiang Li & Zhiyang Shen & Malin Song, 2026. "Green Finance, Biased Technical Progress and Carbon Reduction From the Perspective of Inequality," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 4002-4015, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:31:y:2026:i:3:p:4002-4015
    DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.70131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70131
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ijfe.70131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:31:y:2026:i:3:p:4002-4015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1076-9307/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.