IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ijfiec/v31y2026i2p1833-1859.html

The Return Power of Analyst Reports: Definition, Factor and Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Yongli Li
  • Baoqiang Zhan
  • Tianchen Wang

Abstract

Analyst reports are crucial in financial markets, providing information that guides investment decisions. However, existing research on their profitability and impact, especially over different time horizons, remains inconclusive. This study introduces a novel metric, ‘return power’, to assess the performance of analyst reports in both short‐ and long‐term contexts. We find that analyst reports serve as the short‐term ‘news’ and the long‐term ‘information’, each influencing stock returns differently. Using a dataset of 249,576 analyst reports from the Chinese stock market (2007–2022), we empirically examine key factors—such as broker's status, broker's prior performance, and investors' or analysts' attention—that affect return power at different time horizons. Based on these findings, we design investment strategies utilising both regression models and eight other well‐known machine learning techniques. Our results show that the regression‐based strategy outperforms other machine learning models and a market index, consistently providing superior risk‐adjusted returns across various transaction costs. This study confirms the profitability of analyst reports and offers a practical framework for report‐driven investment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongli Li & Baoqiang Zhan & Tianchen Wang, 2026. "The Return Power of Analyst Reports: Definition, Factor and Strategy," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1833-1859, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:1833-1859
    DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.70018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ijfe.70018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:1833-1859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1076-9307/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.