IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ijfiec/v23y2018i1p29-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The efficacy of financial futures as a hedging tool in electricity markets

Author

Listed:
  • Jim Hanly
  • Lucia Morales
  • Damien Cassells

Abstract

This paper estimates and applies a risk management strategy for electricity spot exposures using futures hedging. We apply our approach to 3 of the most actively traded European electricity markets, Nordpool, APXUK, and Phelix. We compare both optimal hedging strategies and the hedging effectiveness of these markets for 2 hedging horizons, weekly and monthly using both Variance and Value at Risk. Our key finding is that electricity futures can effectively manage risk only for specific time periods when using hedging strategies that have been very successful in financial and other commodity markets. More generally, they are ineffective as a risk management tool when compared with other energy assets. This is especially true at the weekly frequency. We also find significant differences in both the optimal hedge ratios and the hedging effectiveness of the different electricity markets. Better performance is found for the Nordpool market, whereas the poorest performer in hedging terms is the Phelix market.

Suggested Citation

  • Jim Hanly & Lucia Morales & Damien Cassells, 2018. "The efficacy of financial futures as a hedging tool in electricity markets," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 29-40, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:23:y:2018:i:1:p:29-40
    DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.1600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1600
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:23:y:2018:i:1:p:29-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley Content Delivery). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1076-9307/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.