IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/idsxxx/v43y2012i5p9-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deliberation, Dialogue and Debate: Why Researchers need to Engage with Others to Address Complex Issues

Author

Listed:
  • Ajoy Datta

Abstract

As societies have become more differentiated, policy issues are increasingly being analysed using concepts and ideas from the complexity sciences. Policy change involving diverse stakeholders interacting with one another in ways that are shaped by power and politics are increasingly characterised by contestation and unpredictability. Stakeholders other than researchers are collecting information and producing their own knowledge to add new perspectives to those of, and contest the power given to, researchers and their advice. Against this backdrop, I argue that traditional approaches to communicating research to policymakers are inadequate. Researchers now share the field of knowledge production and communication with many others, and where appropriate, those who view their role in relation to policy, should be prepared to engage with stakeholders affected by policy issues and expose their findings to human interaction, review and scrutiny by others.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajoy Datta, 2012. "Deliberation, Dialogue and Debate: Why Researchers need to Engage with Others to Address Complex Issues," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(5), pages 9-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:idsxxx:v:43:y:2012:i:5:p:9-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/idsb.2012.43.issue-5
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roger W. Harris, 2016. "How ICT4D Research Fails the Poor," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 177-192, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:idsxxx:v:43:y:2012:i:5:p:9-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-5012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.