IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v35y2026i6p947-959.html

Long‐Term Care Insurance and Catastrophic Health Spending at the End of Life Among Older Adults: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenyu Zhu
  • Chen Bai

Abstract

End‐of‐life (EOL) health spending imposes catastrophic financial burdens on elderly households, pushing them into poverty without corresponding improvements in health outcomes. Leveraging the quasi‐experiment of China's public long‐term care insurance (LTCI) pilot program, this study employs data from the China Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey to examine the impact of LTCI on catastrophic health spending (CHS) at the end of life. The findings indicate that over the 5‐year EOL period, LTCI significantly decreases the probability of CHS by approximately 36.1–52.3 percentage points and reduces out‐of‐pocket health spending. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that LTCI reduces CHS without compromising EOL health by substituting aggressive medical interventions with sustained long‐term care support, which leads to fewer severe‐illness episodes, shorter hospital stays, and reduced dependency. These findings provide empirical evidence for the role of LTCI in facilitating value‐based healthcare at the end of life, with significant implications for establishing universal LTCI systems in China and other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenyu Zhu & Chen Bai, 2026. "Long‐Term Care Insurance and Catastrophic Health Spending at the End of Life Among Older Adults: Evidence From China," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(6), pages 947-959, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:35:y:2026:i:6:p:947-959
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.70099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70099
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.70099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:35:y:2026:i:6:p:947-959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.