IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v35y2026i4p583-608.html

Minimum Wages, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and Mental Health Around Pregnancy

Author

Listed:
  • Bryce J. Stanley
  • Karen Smith Conway

Abstract

This study estimates the effects on perinatal mental health of the state's minimum wage and earned income tax credit (EITC), controlling for other policies and state‐level factors. Using data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System for 2012–2018 births we find robust evidence that minimum wages and EITC levels reduce depression before pregnancy and suggestive evidence of minimum wages reducing postpartum depression, at least for married respondents. Our estimates suggest that a one dollar increase in the minimum wage ($100 increase in the state EITC) reduces pre‐pregnancy depression by roughly 8.5% (1.5%). These findings stand up to standard robustness and falsification tests, including event study analyses, a wide array of alternative specifications, and finding no effect for those unlikely to benefit (e.g., college‐educated respondents). A supplementary analysis using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System suggests that state EITC levels may reduce mental distress during pregnancy. We investigate possible mechanisms by providing a descriptive analysis of the income and work behavior of such households, which shows the wide reach of these policies, and investigating a broad set of outcomes from the PRAMS, such as financial stressors, health insurance and birth outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryce J. Stanley & Karen Smith Conway, 2026. "Minimum Wages, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and Mental Health Around Pregnancy," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(4), pages 583-608, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:583-608
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.70071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70071
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.70071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:583-608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.