IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v35y2026i2p265-293.html

Import Competition and Racial Disparities in Mortality: Evidence From the Japanese Trade Shock

Author

Listed:
  • Pinka Chatterji
  • Chun‐Yu Ho
  • Quan Qi

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of increased trade between Japan and the U.S. on mortality rates in the U.S. using a shift‐share instrumental variables approach. Overall, we find that an increase in Japanese imports is associated with higher rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and lower rates of mortality from accidents. Effects of Japanese imports on deaths of despair are inconsistent, but there is a positive association between imports and drug‐related deaths. These effects exhibit significant racial disparities. Specifically, a $1000 increase in import competition is associated with a 3.0% increase in CVD deaths per 100,000 Black individuals aged 20–64 years old, while there is no statistically significant effect among whites. Additionally, a $1000 increase in import competition is associated with a 13.5% increase in drug‐related deaths per 100,000 Black individuals aged 20–64 years old compared to a 7.8% increase among white individuals. Effects on mortality rates from accidents are driven by deaths among whites. Our findings also indicate that the rise in CVD and drug‐related mortality is concentrated among males and in regions with relatively high shares of employment in the automobile or computer industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Pinka Chatterji & Chun‐Yu Ho & Quan Qi, 2026. "Import Competition and Racial Disparities in Mortality: Evidence From the Japanese Trade Shock," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 265-293, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:265-293
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.70051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70051
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.70051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:265-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.