IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v34y2025i7p1217-1238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Publicly‐Funded Adult Social Care Impact Informal and Unpaid Carers' Quality of Life in England?

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Longo
  • Karl Claxton
  • Andrea Salas‐Ortiz
  • James Lomas
  • Stephen Martin

Abstract

Informal carers are important for their care recipients, but the burden of care may have a detrimental effect on the carer's well‐being. Publicly‐funded Adult Social Care (simply, ASC) in England may alleviate this burden. We therefore investigate whether ASC expenditure improves carers' quality of life and the channels through which this effect may exist. We analyze data on informal carers from the biennial Survey of Adult Carers in England in 2014/15, 2016/17, 2018/19 and 2021/22. We implement panel data instrumental variables methods that use conditionally exogenous variability in the local taxation to identify the causal effect of ASC expenditure. Our main finding suggests that a £1000‐increase in ASC expenditure per client increases, on average, the carer‐reported quality of life score by 0.3, which amounts to 4.2% of its average in 2021/22. Moreover, ASC expenditure has a beneficial impact on informal carers' care tasks, health, range of employment choices, and finances.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Longo & Karl Claxton & Andrea Salas‐Ortiz & James Lomas & Stephen Martin, 2025. "Does Publicly‐Funded Adult Social Care Impact Informal and Unpaid Carers' Quality of Life in England?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), pages 1217-1238, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:7:p:1217-1238
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.4957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4957
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.4957?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:7:p:1217-1238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.