IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v34y2025i10p1882-1906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sick of Robots—Heterogeneous Effects of Industrial Robots on Sickness Absence

Author

Listed:
  • Janis Umblijs
  • Kjersti Misje Østbakken

Abstract

This paper studies how the introduction of industrial robots affects sickness absence among workers in the manufacturing sector in Norway. We use data on the imports of industrial robots at the firm level, combined with employee‐firm linked register data, to investigate the impact of robotization on the duration of sick leave (SL). We find that robotization leads to a statistically significant increase in SL duration of approximately 1.7 days. Workers in blue‐collar occupations are especially negatively affected, and among this group those with routine tasks experience even higher levels of SL following robotization, with an average increase of around 5 days. We conduct additional analyses looking at different categories of diagnoses across various occupation groups and find heterogeneous effects. Our results suggest that for blue‐collar and routine workers robotization leads to increased musculoskeletal SL, while we only observe an increase in injuries for STEM workers, with maintenance engineers especially negatively affected. Our findings suggest several mechanisms that differ by type of occupation, ranging from musculoskeletal diagnoses caused by repetitive strain to an increase in injuries resulting from working directly with the newly installed industrial robots.

Suggested Citation

  • Janis Umblijs & Kjersti Misje Østbakken, 2025. "Sick of Robots—Heterogeneous Effects of Industrial Robots on Sickness Absence," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(10), pages 1882-1906, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:10:p:1882-1906
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.70010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.70010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:10:p:1882-1906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.