IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v9y2019i4p754-769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two risk metrics for CO2 storage reservoirs with varying domain size, heterogeneity, and injection rate

Author

Listed:
  • Harpreet Singh
  • Grant S. Bromhal

Abstract

Two parameters that play the most important role in the appraisal of environmental risk performance at carbon dioxide (CO2) storage sites are the prospective impact of the pore pressure increase and CO2 saturation. In this context, this study investigates the spatiotemporal evolution of pressure buildup and CO2 saturation as a function of flow region's size, average porosity and permeability, and heterogeneity, as well as the injection rate and total volume of injected fluid. The practical importance of this study is to investigate the factors that affect the extent of pressure buildup and areal extent of CO2 plume both during and after injection, which will impact risk assessment as well as influence effective monitoring operations. This study pursues the above objective using two risk metrics that are based on numerical simulations and illustrated using representative models of three realistic storage sites with varying volumetric storage potential and geological settings, all with open geologic systems. The two metrics (the spatiotemporal extent of pressure buildup and CO2 saturation plume, respectively) used in this study are able to capture the geologic (structural and petrophysical) and operational complexities that cannot be incorporated into analytical or semianalytical solutions. The results of this study suggest that in addition to the average permeability, the areal extent of the pressure buildup during the injection period is strongly related to the injection rate, whereas the postinjection period may be more strongly influenced by the reservoir heterogeneity. The areal extent of the saturation plume during active injection is highly correlated to the mass of injected fluid, and the postinjection behavior is impacted by the shape of the reservoir–seal interface. These findings are consistent with other recent studies by the National Risk Assessment Partnership (NRAP) on characteristic reservoir behavior. The results have been used to generate pressure and saturation plume profiles (over time) that can be used to support risk‐based decision making. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Harpreet Singh & Grant S. Bromhal, 2019. "Two risk metrics for CO2 storage reservoirs with varying domain size, heterogeneity, and injection rate," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 9(4), pages 754-769, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:9:y:2019:i:4:p:754-769
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1894
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.1894?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:9:y:2019:i:4:p:754-769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.