IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v8y2018i2p349-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of different fluids on microcrack propagation in sandstone under true triaxial loading conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Shaobin Hu
  • Xiaochun Li
  • Bing Bai

Abstract

The mechanical behavior of rock under conditions of multiphase fluids is currently a key scientific issue in the field of geotechnical engineering. In this work, we conducted triaxial compression experiments of initially water†saturated samples, which were flooded with CO2 using the semipermeable separator method; comparatively investigated the mechanical behaviors of sandstone under the conditions of mono†phase fluids CO2/N2/H2O and biphase fluid CO2†H2O; and analyzed the stress†strain characteristics, internal crack expansion, and macrocrack failure patterns of sandstones. Compared with H2O, CO2 and N2 could lead sandstone cracks to show a pattern of multiple fractures, displaying a double shear failure mode and multiple branch cracks along principal fractures. Moreover, the cracking effect of supercritical CO2 was more evident. Under the conditions of pore pressure of 10 MPa and temperature of 323 K, the ratio of work done by CO2, N2 and H2O during crack expansion was 23.5:24.1:1, with transient pressure drops to 7.82 MPa, 9.25 MPa, and 0.1 MPa, respectively. Overall, the study analyzed the mechanisms of physicochemical interactions of fluid types and the number of phases in sandstone minerals at the microscale and revealed the mechanical mechanism between fluids and rock minerals, as well as the impacts of these fluids on the strength, internal crack expansion and deformation of sandstone. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaobin Hu & Xiaochun Li & Bing Bai, 2018. "Effects of different fluids on microcrack propagation in sandstone under true triaxial loading conditions," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 349-365, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:349-365
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1744
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.1744?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:349-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.