IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v4y2014i2p244-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kinetic modeling of laboratory CO 2 ‐exposure experiments performed on whole rock reservoir samples

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Fischer
  • Marco De Lucia
  • Axel Liebscher

Abstract

Mineralogical and geochemical observations from laboratory CO 2 ‐exposure experiments on reservoir rocks are compared with predictions from geochemical modeling that was performed using PHREEQC software. The Pitzer‐based Eq 3/6 thermodynamic database, provided by Quintessa Ltd., was applied. For kinetic modeling, a Lasaga‐type rate equation was implemented and different models were parameterized taking kinetic rate law parameters from literature. Based on previous modeling studies a modified inverse modeling approach is presented here. This comprises several different Fe‐proxies and improved statistical ranking preferences that were implemented in particular to better match modeled and measured concentrations of dissolved K-super-+, Fe-super-2+ and Al-super-3+. Compared to the previous approach, the presented modeling results are in good (better) agreement with experimental data. Systematic discrepancies between modeling and observation still occur regarding K‐bearing mineral phases and corresponding K-super-+ brine concentrations. Despite missing correlation between K-super-+ and Cl-super-− concentrations, potential reasons for these discrepancies may be increased K-super-+ brine concentrations during the experiments due to dissolution of K‐rich salt(s), such as sylvite. Much better matches were generated for dissolved Fe-super-2+ concentrations. Goethite mainly controls the chemical behavior of dissolved Fe-super-2+ in kinetic simulations. Based on both the available equilibrium and kinetic modeling results, the ultimate fate of dissolved Al-super-3+ and the analysis of Al‐bearing mineral phases potentially controlling dissolved Al-super-3+ brine concentrations cannot be conclusively determined. The overall best ranked kinetic model comprises anhydrite, dolomite, goethite, K‐feldspar and kaolinite. Despite minor inconsistencies dissolved Fe-super-2+, Al-super-3+ and Si-super-4+ were in particular much better reproduced by the best ranked kinetic models.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Fischer & Marco De Lucia & Axel Liebscher, 2014. "Kinetic modeling of laboratory CO 2 ‐exposure experiments performed on whole rock reservoir samples," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 244-256, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:244-256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1415
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Kempka & Ben Norden & Alexandra Ivanova & Stefan Lüth, 2017. "Revising the Static Geological Reservoir Model of the Upper Triassic Stuttgart Formation at the Ketzin Pilot Site for CO 2 Storage by Integrated Inverse Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:244-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.