IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v4y2014i1p20-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A tiered area‐of‐review framework for geologic carbon sequestration

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Birkholzer
  • Abdullah Cihan
  • Karl Bandilla

Abstract

This paper discusses the current guidance given by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on delineating the so‐called Area of Review (AoR) for the permitting of geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) projects. According to the EPA's regulatory framework for GCS, the AoR refers to the region surrounding the CO 2 injection well(s) wherein leakage of CO 2 and/or the migration of formation fluids could possibly endanger overlying groundwater resources. Our evaluation of the current framework for delineating the size of this area finds unnecessary conservatism in the definition of the critical pressure, which could lead to a heavy burden on permit applicants that seek to get regulatory compliance, in particular for very large GCS projects. We propose a risk‐based re‐interpretation of this framework, separating the total Area of Review into different sub‐areas with different regulatory requirements depending on whether the concern is about free‐phase CO 2 or pressure‐driven brine migration. This leads to a tiered AoR definition in which the projected region of CO 2 plume extent would have the highest regulatory standards regarding site characterization, monitoring, and corrective action. The requirements in the AoR outside this central region would be less burdensome because of a narrower focus on major pathways for brine leakage such as unplugged wellbores and large faults. We expect that this revised framework would allow for a reduction in the cost of regulatory compliance for projects with very large injection volumes, while ensuring that the objective of protecting valuable groundwater resources is preserved.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Birkholzer & Abdullah Cihan & Karl Bandilla, 2014. "A tiered area‐of‐review framework for geologic carbon sequestration," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 20-35, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:20-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1393
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yiman Li & Zhonghe Pang & Fengtian Yang & Chao Jin, 2016. "Geochemical responses of a saline aquifer to CO 2 injection: experimental study on Guantao formation of Bohai Bay Basin, East China," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 125-137, February.
    2. Curtis M. Oldenburg & Abdullah Cihan & Quanlin Zhou & Stacey Fairweather & Lee H. Spangler, 2016. "Geologic carbon sequestration injection wells in overpressured storage reservoirs: estimating area of review," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(6), pages 775-786, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:20-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.