IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v16y2026i4p597-610.html

Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the Indian Food System: A Cradle‐to‐Consumption Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Supriya Priyadarsani
  • Manish Debnath
  • Jaiprakash Bisen
  • Rahul Tripathi
  • Sangita Mohanty
  • Nitiprasad Namdeorao Jambulkar
  • Amaresh Kumar Nayak
  • Himanshu Pathak

Abstract

The global food system accounts for roughly 25%–30% of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Without emission estimates, it is difficult to identify major sources of emissions as well as monitor the progress towards climate goals such as the Paris Agreement, net‐zero emissions and Carbon Credit. The rapidly evolving food system of India is contributing significantly to national GHG emissions; nevertheless, a comprehensive understanding of emissions across the food life cycle is still limited. Present study was undertaken to analyse state‐wise GHG emissions from on‐farm and off‐farm activities as well as various stages of agri‐food life cycle. For this, data pertaining to consumption of 12 major food groups (combination of 405 food items) across 30 states of India was extracted from NSSO report 2022–23, and different methodologies were used for getting GHG emissions at each stage of agri‐food life cycle. Findings indicated that production of livestock products, though less consumed than cereals, has disproportionately higher GHG intensities (89.81%) than crops (10.19%) due to enteric fermentation and feed production. Life cycle assessment (LCA) indicated that among all food crops, production of rice contributed to 2.26% followed by oilseeds (2.20%) and least by wheat (0.55%) towards GHG emission. Emission from other stages like transport of rice was highest (24%) followed by fruits (19%) and meat (10%), respectively. Regional disparities in dietary patterns and agricultural practices further influenced the emission profiles. Considering the production scenario, the top four GHG emitters (from production scenario) were Haryana (2079.44) > Telangana (1934.49) > Andhra Pradesh (1873.37) > Punjab (1844.72 kg CO2e/capita/year). In case of consumption the trend was Nagaland (1387.38 kg CO2e/capita/year) > Sikkim (1304.09 kg CO2/capita/year) > Ladakh (1085.11 kg CO2e/capita/year) > Arunachal Pradesh (1055.36 kg CO2e/capita/year) due to high per capita consumption of meat and rice. GHG emissions resulting from inter‐state transport to the union territories ranged between 0.886 and 1.734 kg CO2e/kg of product, highlighting their substantial dependence on external food sources. This study focused on the potential of dietary shifts, improved agricultural practices and reduced food waste as key mitigation strategies. These insights will provide critical direction for low‐carbon food system transitions in developing economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Supriya Priyadarsani & Manish Debnath & Jaiprakash Bisen & Rahul Tripathi & Sangita Mohanty & Nitiprasad Namdeorao Jambulkar & Amaresh Kumar Nayak & Himanshu Pathak, 2026. "Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of the Indian Food System: A Cradle‐to‐Consumption Assessment," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 16(4), pages 597-610, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:16:y:2026:i:4:p:597-610
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.70020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.70020
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.70020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:16:y:2026:i:4:p:597-610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.