Author
Listed:
- Soomro Sarmad
- Dennis Lu
- Zhenkun Sun
- Muhammad Mubashir
- Abid Ali
- Lunbo Duan
Abstract
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies are essential for mitigating global CO2 emissions, yet challenges such as high energy consumption and material degradation hinder their widespread adoption. This study investigates the integration of nickel (Ni) into calcium oxide (CaO) sorbents to enhance CO2 capture efficiency by leveraging Ni's catalytic properties to optimize carbonation kinetics. Aspen Plus simulations were employed to evaluate the effects of varying Ni concentrations (5–25 wt%) on reaction rates, activation energy, and carbonation efficiency. The results revealed that adding Ni considerably reduced the activation energy from 178 kJ/mol (pure CaO) to 70–90 kJ/mol. The maximum catalytic efficiency was achieved at 20 wt% Ni. At this concentration, the rate of the carbonation reaction increased exponentially, leading to considerable improvements in CO2 collection and CaCO3 formation rates. Sensitivity analysis identified key operational parameters, such as temperature, CO2 partial pressure, and flow rates, for improving process optimization in industrial settings. In comparison to typical CaO‐based sorbents, Ni–CaO blends demonstrated higher catalytic efficiency and lower energy needs, addressing key challenges in CCS systems. This work distinguishes itself from previous CaO stability studies by integrating process optimization and kinetic modeling, resulting in practical insights for the development of energy‐efficient CO2 capture technologies. Future research ought to explore the long‐term stability of Ni–CaO sorbents and incorporate renewable energy sources to increase the sustainability and economic feasibility of CCS systems.
Suggested Citation
Soomro Sarmad & Dennis Lu & Zhenkun Sun & Muhammad Mubashir & Abid Ali & Lunbo Duan, 2026.
"Optimization of CaO–Ni Blends for Enhanced CO2 Adsorption: Aspen Plus Simulation Study,"
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 16(1), pages 33-45, February.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:greenh:v:16:y:2026:i:1:p:33-45
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2385
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:16:y:2026:i:1:p:33-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.