IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v15y2025i4p487-510.html

CO2 Storage Site Selection: A Comprehensive Review of Current Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Shahryar Rashidi
  • Seyed Shariatipour
  • Mohammadreza Bagheri

Abstract

Global warming, driven by increasing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, has emerged as a critical environmental concern. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology offers a promising solution for reducing CO2 emissions, but its effectiveness depends on identifying suitable candidates that can ensure safe, long‐term storage of CO2. This study proposes a systematic four‐stage workflow for selecting optimal CO2 storage sites, developed through a comprehensive review of existing approaches. The workflow begins with preliminary, large‐scale assessments of broad geographic areas, such as sedimentary basins, using geological, technical, environmental, and economic criteria. Although these assessments provide valuable regional insights, they often lack the resolution required for precise evaluations. Site‐specific frameworks bridge this gap by examining individual candidates, such as saline aquifers and depleted reservoirs. However, basic frameworks frequently oversimplify suitability evaluation by neglecting the interdependencies and uncertainties inherent in real‐world conditions. To address these challenges, advanced frameworks are incorporated to apply multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) methods and optimization techniques, such as pinch analysis and process graphs. MCDM‐based frameworks weigh conflicting criteria, whereas optimization‐based frameworks ensure the technical and economic feasibility of CO2 allocation in the source‐to‐sink matching problem. Applying this workflow to the UK context reveals the need for advanced assessments of storage candidates such as the Bunter Sandstone Formation, demonstrating that relying solely on basic frameworks is insufficient. The findings underscore the importance of integrated approaches that combine both basic and advanced suitability evaluations to enhance the robustness of site‐selection practices. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahryar Rashidi & Seyed Shariatipour & Mohammadreza Bagheri, 2025. "CO2 Storage Site Selection: A Comprehensive Review of Current Approaches," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 15(4), pages 487-510, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:487-510
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2349
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Michael Humphries Choptiany & Ronald Pelot, 2014. "A Multicriteria Decision Analysis Model and Risk Assessment Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(9), pages 1720-1737, September.
    2. Lee, Sin Cherng & Sum Ng, Denny Kok & Yee Foo, Dominic Chwan & Tan, Raymond R., 2009. "Extended pinch targeting techniques for carbon-constrained energy sector planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 60-67, January.
    3. Al-Mayyahi, Mohmmad A. & Hoadley, Andrew F.A. & Rangaiah, G.P., 2013. "A novel graphical approach to target CO2 emissions for energy resource planning and utility system optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 783-790.
    4. Atkins, Martin J. & Morrison, Andrew S. & Walmsley, Michael R.W., 2010. "Carbon Emissions Pinch Analysis (CEPA) for emissions reduction in the New Zealand electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 982-987, March.
    5. Liu, Bingsheng & Liu, Song & Xue, Bin & Lu, Shijian & Yang, Yang, 2021. "Formalizing an integrated decision-making model for the risk assessment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage projects: From a sustainability perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    6. Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R. & Ng, Denny K.S., 2008. "Carbon and footprint-constrained energy planning using cascade analysis technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1480-1488.
    7. Sun, Xiaolong & Alcalde, Juan & Bakhtbidar, Mahdi & Elío, Javier & Vilarrasa, Víctor & Canal, Jacobo & Ballesteros, Julio & Heinemann, Niklas & Haszeldine, Stuart & Cavanagh, Andrew & Vega-Maza, David, 2021. "Hubs and clusters approach to unlock the development of carbon capture and storage – Case study in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    8. Ooi, Raymond E.H. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2014. "Targeting for carbon sequestration retrofit planning in the power generation sector for multi-period problems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 477-487.
    9. Ho, W.S. & Hashim, H. & Hassim, M.H. & Muis, Z.A. & Shamsuddin, N.L.M., 2012. "Design of distributed energy system through Electric System Cascade Analysis (ESCA)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 309-315.
    10. Corinne Le Quéré & Robert B. Jackson & Matthew W. Jones & Adam J. P. Smith & Sam Abernethy & Robbie M. Andrew & Anthony J. De-Gol & David R. Willis & Yuli Shan & Josep G. Canadell & Pierre Friedlingst, 2020. "Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(7), pages 647-653, July.
    11. Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2007. "Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained energy sector planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1422-1429.
    12. Clair Gough & Michelle Bentham & Simon Shackley & Sam Holloway, 2009. "Carbon dioxide capture and storage scenarios: a case study of the East Midlands and Yorkshire (UK)," International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(3/4), pages 272-294.
    13. Bradshaw, J & Allinson, G & Bradshaw, B.E & Nguyen, V & Rigg, A.J & Spencer, L & Wilson, P, 2004. "Australia’s CO2 geological storage potential and matching of emission sources to potential sinks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1623-1631.
    14. Damen, Kay & Faaij, André & van Bergen, Frank & Gale, John & Lysen, Erik, 2005. "Identification of early opportunities for CO2 sequestration—worldwide screening for CO2-EOR and CO2-ECBM projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 1931-1952.
    15. de Lira Quaresma, Ana Carolina & Francisco, Flávio S. & Pessoa, Fernando L.P. & Queiroz, Eduardo M., 2018. "Carbon emission reduction in the Brazilian electricity sector using Carbon Sources Diagram," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 134-150.
    16. Li, Zhiwei & Jia, Xiaoping & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2016. "Minimizing carbon footprint using pinch analysis: The case of regional renewable electricity planning in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1051-1062.
    17. Callas, Catherine & Saltzer, Sarah D. & Steve Davis, J. & Hashemi, Sam S. & Kovscek, Anthony R. & Okoroafor, Esuru R. & Wen, Gege & Zoback, Mark D. & Benson, Sally M., 2022. "Criteria and workflow for selecting depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs for carbon storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lopez, Neil Stephen A. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2021. "Optimizing regional electricity trading with Carbon Emissions Pinch Analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. de Lira Quaresma, Ana Carolina & Francisco, Flávio S. & Pessoa, Fernando L.P. & Queiroz, Eduardo M., 2018. "Carbon emission reduction in the Brazilian electricity sector using Carbon Sources Diagram," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 134-150.
    3. Lee, Jui-Yuan, 2017. "A multi-period optimisation model for planning carbon sequestration retrofits in the electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 12-20.
    4. Yuan, Tiejiang & Mao, Yaling, 2024. "A review of pinch analysis techniques and extended application in power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Jia, Xuexiu, 2018. "New directions in the implementation of Pinch Methodology (PM)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 439-468.
    6. Rok Gomilšek & Lidija Čuček & Marko Homšak & Raymond R. Tan & Zdravko Kravanja, 2020. "Carbon Emissions Constrained Energy Planning for Aluminum Products," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Jui-Yuan Lee & Han-Fu Lin, 2019. "Multi-Footprint Constrained Energy Sector Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Krishna Priya, G.S. & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2017. "Multi-objective pinch analysis for power system planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 335-347.
    9. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J. & Kamp, Peter J.J. & Neale, James R., 2014. "Minimising carbon emissions and energy expended for electricity generation in New Zealand through to 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 656-665.
    10. Nair, Purusothmn Nair S Bhasker & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2022. "Extended graphical approach for the implementation of energy-consuming negative emission technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Yu, Dongwei & Tan, Hongwei, 2016. "Application of ‘potential carbon’ in energy planning with carbon emission constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 363-369.
    12. Ooi, Raymond E.H. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Tan, Raymond R., 2014. "Targeting for carbon sequestration retrofit planning in the power generation sector for multi-period problems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 477-487.
    13. Jia, Xiaoping & Xu, Tianshu & Zhang, Yanmei & Li, Zhiwei & Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Wang, Fang, 2023. "An improved multi-period algebraic targeting approach to low carbon energy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    14. Liang, Sai & Zhang, Tianzhu, 2011. "Managing urban energy system: A case of Suzhou in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2910-2918, May.
    15. Sinha, Rakesh Kumar & Chaturvedi, Nitin Dutt, 2019. "A review on carbon emission reduction in industries and planning emission limits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Mohd Yahya, Nur Syahira & Ng, Lik Yin & Andiappan, Viknesh, 2021. "Optimisation and planning of biomass supply chain for new and existing power plants based on carbon reduction targets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    17. Yang Zhang & Hekun Wang & Taomeizi Zhou & Zhiwei Li & Xiaoping Jia, 2022. "Extended Carbon Emission Pinch Analysis for the Low-Carbon Tobacco Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Nair, Purusothmn Nair S. Bhasker & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2021. "A generic algebraic targeting approach for integration of renewable energy sources, CO2 capture and storage and negative emission technologies in carbon-constrained energy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    19. Tan, Raymond R., 2011. "A general source-sink model with inoperability constraints for robust energy sector planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3759-3764.
    20. Lin, Keyao & Wei, Ning & Jiang, Dalin & Zhang, Yao, 2026. "Progress and perspectives in source-sink matching for CCUS: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PB).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:487-510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.